• Round Two: Things Get Messy and Even More Questions

    Posted by KATHERINE (KATY) CAUGHRAN on 6/7/2016 4:45:00 PM

    Institute for Innovation: Round Two Blog Update!

         Happy to announce that the grant was accepted and we can continue on with our learning journey! Round Two: Mission Collaboration is is unique and innovative because it is unlike other proposals and asks for continuous learning of a group that has the potential to impact learning at all levels for all students of our school district. We will build on our knowledge and adapt it to fit each student.

         Part of the opportunity this grant gives the enrichment teachers in our district, including myself, is the chance to go to UCONN's Confratute. This will allow us to explore and deepen our understanding of gifted education and how to adapt the ideas of Joseph Renzulli and Sally Reis to fit our student population and culture in Mountain Brook. I attended this conference last year and it was an intense learning experience that answered questions, but also led me to ask more than I started with on my journey.

         Renzulli and Reis believe that enrichment models should not look the same across the board because the students in every single school and system around he world have different needs and cultures. One size does not fit all. Confratute is about a lot more than simply learning how to implement Schoolwide Enrichment. The conference allows sessions on critical thinking, creativity, social and emotional issues, content areas, strategies for all educators, administrative roles and personalized time with experts to talk about your own unique school and start planning. The experience is invaluable.

         Next summer, July 2017, we will travel to Storrs CT for a week of immersion in all of the learning Confratute has to offer. We will have time to attend various workshops and share knowledge with one another. We will have time to ask questions and push our thinking. We will have time to work with Renzulli, Reis and other professionals. We will have time to form a bond as a PLC with new teachers and process our new learning together. We will also be able to think forward to the progress MBS is making and how our learning fits in with the direction we are all going.

         While our mission is to make gains to improve our own PAGE program as a whole and at individual schools, we will consider ALL students in our district and how gifted education plays a role in education overall for MBS students. I know I speak for all of the PAGE teachers in thanking The Mountain Brook Foundation and each of our principals for making this dream a reality.

         Institute for Innovation has truly given me the opportunity to not only ignite passion in my students, but in myself. I am more motivated and excited now than I have ever been in my ten years of teaching. I am honored to be a part of a school system that genuinely encourages personal and professional growth.



    Some questions and thoughts about giftedness and identification...

         We give a gifted screener and look for gifted characteristics in second grade to make sure we are not missing children, but then think we need to reserve specific learning opportunities for those deemed gifted. Why would we not expose ALL children to the same types of learning environments and opportunities to see who needs and wants more?

         There is no way to deny the fact that there are children (and adults) who learn and think differently. Social and emotional development, critical and creative thinking skills, intellectual ability, task commitment and motivation are all key parts to the discussion. I cannot help but think that all children learn and think differently.

         Even students who are given the title of gifted do not fit in one neatly labeled box. As a society, we do not agree on one hard and fast definition for gifted. There is not just one characteristic for a gifted child. We miss kids who should be identified. Could we spend more time and money on the focus of training teachers on building relationships with kids, differentiation and customization and less on testing and identifying kids? Teachers need to be able to focus on the needs of each child and less on if checking off certain boxes to align with a group.

    Comments (-1)
  • Confratute and Beyond

    Posted by Katy Caughran on 8/10/2015

    Institute for Innovation has provided us with truly meaningful learning opportunities over the last few months. We have spent this summer intently focused on the most effective, challenging and engaging methods for reaching each child where they are in their learning. Our week spent at UCONN in July allowed us to build our knowledge base and work individually with experts, researchers and professors in the field of enrichment and education.

     Furthermore, Mandi was able to attend a second conference on gifted education for Alabama. This experience provided her with essential information regarding best practice, standards, legalities and creative strategies for differentiating curriculum. The PAGE PLC also had time to connect and share innovative ideas to explore this school year.

     Additionally, we were able to build strong relationships with the talented professionals both locally and nationally. These contacts will be critical in developing ideas in the years to come. All of the people we met were enthusiastic, inspiring and genuine in their efforts to get to know us as individuals, not only as teachers. We knew making connections with students and colleagues was a key ingredient to growth. Both of us were the students this summer. Both of us realized how these bonds made all of the difference in instilling a passion for lifelong learning and a willingness to dig deeper. We are ready to make our learning transferable!

     

    Our time was focused on researching, brainstorming, planning, and reflecting. Equipped with greater understanding and insight on enrichment programming and engagement, we now can start the process of adapting our learning for the culture and population of Mountain Brook Schools. We are eager to start learning with our children and fellow teachers in the new school year! We know we will gain more perspective as we gradually implement student-focused and interest based designs. 

    Comments (-1)
  • A list of questions to guide research...

    Posted by KATHERINE (KATY) CAUGHRAN on 4/29/2015 7:00:00 PM
    Here are a few questions (in no certain order) that come to mind when thinking about...keep scrolling to #35
    • Our future roles with enrichment within our buildings 
    • The future of our enrichment/gifted program in MBS
    • The roles of classroom teachers when considering enrichment
    1. What are our roles as the PAGE teachers currently?
    2. In what ways could those roles change?
    3. Do they need to change?
    4. Would our roles ever overlap the other schools?
    5. Does our program name reflect our work with our students?  
    6.  If not, what is missing?
    7. Are we wanting to gear our program toward profoundly gifted children?
    8. What are the positive and negative aspects of changing who are program is actually for in the future?
    9. Do we consider the social and emotional needs of gifted students enough in our program?
    10.  If not, how could we do a better job with this?  Why is it important?
    11. Do we believe that there is a need for gifted children to be pulled out of the regular classroom?
    12. Do all of the children currently receiving services need to be served?
    13.  If we change our plan, services, and roles, will we grandfather in those students that were already receiving services?
    14. How will we involve teachers, students, and the community in a decision that greatly impacts them?
    15. With all of the information available on gifted education, how will we know what is really best for our students?
    16. Do we believe as a district that there is a need for gifted education?  To what extent?
    17.  At what point does some of the responsibility for enrichment stand with the teachers and their methods for differentiation?
    18. Do we agree that all 4 schools need to identify, fund, and serve in the same ways?
    19. How do we feel about encouraging competition in elementary school as a means to serve students?
    20. Do we believe that if a child is placed in PAGE at one school that they should be automatically accepted at another school within the district?
    21. What are we doing to make sure that all students who need services are identified?
    22.  Is the referral process for parents the same at each school in MBS?  If not, should it be?
    23.  Should JUNA  be a way to serve 6th grade PAGE students or open for all to apply?
    24.  If JUNA is apply all, should their be a more data driven eligibility process?
    25. How should parents and students receive eligibility information about JUNA?  Should it be similar to PAGE?
    26. What is stopping us from being considered a gifted program by the state?
    27. Are we doing our kids a disservice by not being considered a gifted program by the state?
    28.  Will the new standards put out by the state for gifted ed have any impact on us if we are considered to be an enrichment program, not gifted?
    29. If so, what are the implications?
    30. With any changes that we want to make after research, what will the state cling to as requirements and what will they allow us to do within our district?
    31.  A lot of people in gifted ed seem to think that gifted ed programs are not elitist, but why does our program seem to have that vibe?
    32. How can we serve gifted students who need services and still work with all students with enrichment?
    33. What do we think about opportunities like Genius Hour, Pumpkin Drop, Google Design, Expressions, school plays and performances in terms of giving opportunities for all students to be successful?
    34. What do we do in PAGE that challenges our students?  Could other students do the same work if they had the opportunity? How do we know? 
    35. Gifted education has typically been cyclical in nature from the start.  I want to know if the whole idea of gifted education and the types of services possible are all outdated.  Could it be that there is a whole new approach that has not been introduced yet?  Could this approach simply not be accepted because it does not fall within our old way of thinking?
    Comments (-1)
  • Registration complete, flights booked, and research started!

    Posted by KATHERINE (KATY) CAUGHRAN on 4/28/2015 3:00:00 PM
    Mandi and I are officially registered for Confratute 2015, where we hope to learn more about enrichment programming ideas that we can adapt to fit the needs of our system and each child in our district.  We also expect to gain better understanding of what our role looks like now and how it will look in the future when we put our focus on our students.  We will also network with those at the conference who will help us achieve our goals.  
     
    So what do we do before we go?
     
    Read.  Research. Tweet.  Network.  Ask questions.  Ask harder questions.  Repeat.   
     
    Here are a few questions (in no certain order) that come to mind when thinking about...
    • Our future roles with enrichment within our buildings 
    • The future of our enrichment/gifted program in MBS
    • The roles of classroom teachers when considering enrichment
    1. What are our roles as the PAGE teachers currently?
    2. In what ways could those roles change?
    3. Do they need to change?
    4. Would our roles ever overlap the other schools?
    5. Does our program name reflect our work with our students?  
    6.  If not, what is missing?
    7. Are we wanting to gear our program toward profoundly gifted children?
    8. What are the positive and negative aspects of changing who are program is actually for in the future?
    9. Do we consider the social and emotional needs of gifted students enough in our program?
    10.  If not, how could we do a better job with this?  Why is it important?
    11. Do we believe that there is a need for gifted children to be pulled out of the regular classroom?
    12. Do all of the children currently receiving services need to be served?
    13.  If we change our plan, services, and roles, will we grandfather in those students that were already receiving services?
    14. How will we involve teachers, students, and the community in a decision that greatly impacts them?
    15. With all of the information available on gifted education, how will we know what is really best for our students?
    16. Do we believe as a district that there is a need for gifted education?  To what extent?
    17.  At what point does some of the responsibility for enrichment stand with the teachers and their methods for differentiation?
    18. Do we agree that all 4 schools need to identify, fund, and serve in the same ways?
    19. How do we feel about encouraging competition in elementary school as a means to serve students?
    20. Do we believe that if a child is placed in PAGE at one school that they should be automatically accepted at another school within the district?
    21. What are we doing to make sure that all students who need services are identified?
    22.  Is the referral process for parents the same at each school in MBS?  If not, should it be?
    23.  Should JUNA  be a way to serve 6th grade PAGE students or open for all to apply?
    24.  If JUNA is apply all, should their be a more data driven eligibility process?
    25. How should parents and students receive eligibility information about JUNA?  Should it be similar to PAGE?
    26. What is stopping us from being considered a gifted program by the state?
    27. Are we doing our kids a disservice by not being considered a gifted program by the state?
    28.  Will the new standards put out by the state for gifted ed have any impact on us if we are considered to be an enrichment program, not gifted?
    29. If so, what are the implications?
    30. With any changes that we want to make after research, what will the state cling to as requirements and what will they allow us to do within our district?
    31.  A lot of people in gifted ed seem to think that gifted ed programs are not elitist, but why does our program seem to have that vibe?
    32. How can we serve gifted students who need services and still work with all students with enrichment?
    33. What do we think about opportunities like Genius Hour, Pumpkin Drop, Google Design, Expressions, school plays and performances in terms of giving opportunities for all students to be successful?
    34. What do we do in PAGE that challenges our students?  Could other students do the same work if they had the opportunity? How do we know? 
    35. Gifted education has typically been cyclical in nature from the start.  I want to know if the whole idea of gifted education and the types of services possible are all outdated.  Could it be that there is a whole new approach that has not been introduced yet?  Could this approach simply not be accepted because it does not fall within our old way of thinking?
     
    Comments (-1)
  • Introduction

    Posted by Katy Caughran on 4/12/2015
    Researching a Model of Enrichment for All 
    Submitted by: Mandi Hoxter, (MBE), Katy Caughran, (BWF)
     
    It’s an exciting time to be in education as we embrace change and determine the most effective ways to reach our learners to instill the passion for learning.  Educators must make decisions that are student centered.  Our proposal is one that will not only help us gain perspective professionally, but help our students across the district form a growth mindset.  We know we need to reach each one of our students, guide them to reach their potential, and develop a true passion for learning.   We are living in a world of constant change that calls us to teach to the individual child. We would like to research new ways to engage learners who want to dig deeper and answer those burning questions.  We want all students to have an opportunity to get their hands dirty, build, connect and explore.  We want all teachers and students to embrace creativity, innovation, and technology.  We will research, network, and travel to various schools to help us develop an enrichment model with a “rising tide lifts all ships” perspective.  We will also be active participants this summer at UCONN’s National Conference on Gifted Education called Confratute.  We will take this year to research and adapt the best of all models to fit the needs of all of our kids in the district. 

    Enrichment

    Comments (-1)