Wikipedia:XfD today

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< September 18	September 20 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

List of songs referencing Elvis Presley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list fails WP:NLIST and I can't find sourcing indicating that this list topic has been discussed by reliable sources. A good number of these songs are unsourced, and this is simply a trivia page. We deleted a page like this relating to Beyonce, and I don't think we need one for Elvis either, or any artist for that matter. 750 h+ 13:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. 750 h+ 13:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a lyrics database. See WP:NOTDATABASE — Maile (talk) 13:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Characters in the Thursday Next series

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable and unsourced character page which serves mostly as fictioncruft. I'd try to merge it to Thursday Next as an ATD but that article only concerns the character, not the series itself. Nighfidelity (talk) 13:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Razafindrakoto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod with reason of medalling in Indian Ocean Island Games. The games are a minor low tier competition that wouldn't meet WP:NATH. Also did not finish Olympic event. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 12:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 12:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cell autonomous sex identity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I will be first to admit this is a notable topic. But the article is 100% LLM slop, with all the greatest hits: Meandering text, uniformly-sized and -paced subsections, bulleted lists, "advantages and disadvantages", the obligatory "implications for..." section, key principles and niche offshoot applications given equal weight in the text. It's an absolute mess.

I just finished a complete rewrite of another article that was LLM-written and structured very similarly to this one. I didn't think it should be deleted because it too was a notable topic. After that ordeal, I don't ever want to bother again. Blow the whole thing up and let a user who actually cares write the article. This one at least has real references to get you started. An article created without effort should be deleted without effort. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 10:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 10:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Israel and claims of supernatural warfare

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of RS (and plenty of FRINGE sources) and it's just a collection of purported quotes from Iranian officials. Feels like WP:OR to make this an entire article. Should be deleted or worth a small mention in Iran–Israel relations. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conspiracy theories, Iran, and Israel. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. jolielover♥talk 10:35, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thought I should participate here, as I cleaned the new article up and tagged it as reviewed. Your point about it being notable enough for a separate article might make sense, but the sources aren't all fringe: one Times of Israel, two Jerusalem Post, one Israel National News. All three are well to my right, but is there any prior consensus that they're not RS? Wikishovel (talk) 10:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nastik (upcoming film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of meeting WP:NFILM. Last deleted by prod in 2021, with the rationale "Does not satisfy any version of film notability guidelines because the film seems to be in development limbo, so that an article is crystal balling.". The previous version was created by User:Rashkeqamar, now blocked as a sock of User:Chutrandi, with the title Nastik (2018 film). That was moved to Nastik (upcoming film), then prodded. In a WP:BEFORE search, I can find no evidence in English or Hindi RS newer than 2018 that the film will ever see the light of day, apart from passing mentions in articles about notable film actors, e.g. [1] and [2], where it's described as "in the pipeline" or similar. This new attempt was originally titled Nastik (Varma) for some reason. Wikishovel (talk) 09:23, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Wikishovel (talk) 09:23, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~and add WP:BLUELOCK~~ - Unreleased film with no sources available post 2018. Fails in WP:NFILM. Probably lost in production hell - a page about this film is nothing but a WP:CRYSTALBALL. ~~We can't feed the negativity~~. If it ever gets momentum in the future, then I have no issues with a WP:REFUND to draftspace. BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SMRT Active Route Map Information System

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am quite certain that most of the content in this article are already covered in other articles related to the Singapore MRT network. I do not see how a stand alone article about an information system meets the threshold of notability. Aleain (talk) 09:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Singapore. jolielover♥talk 10:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Felista Di Super Star

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not established and not ready yet. A case of WP:TOOSOON. - The9Man ^Talk 09:05, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Uganda. jolielover♥talk 10:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1996 Eurocopter HH-65 Israeli Navy helicopter crash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t believe this helicopter crash meets WP:EVENTCRIT, indeed it seems an entirely ROTM accident. Some people died, lessons were learned and protocol changed, as is the norm after every air accident investigation. Mccapra (talk) 08:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Israel. Mccapra (talk) 08:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I think the fact that this was the first fatalities from the 193 Squadron makes the crash notable. It also significantly altered the way the Air Force conducted training operations. Deleting this page would be erasing valuable history Aesurias (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You might wish to !vote keep then. Metallurgist (talk) 01:51, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Military. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Coverage 16 years later does add some notability. Metallurgist (talk) 02:00, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to 193 Squadron (Israel). This is a military aircraft crash, and military aircraft crashes - even those that lead to changes in military proceudres - are WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. It's notable as part of the squadron's history, but not sufficiently for a standalone article. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 08:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie K. Nihon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification; WP:DRAFTOBJECT applies. Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:BIO, WP:NFILMMAKER, and this WP:GNG. Very limited sourcing. Creating editor is a declared WP:PAID editor and has moved this to mainspace. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Television, Visual arts, and Bahamas. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Fashion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Apart from notability concerns, the article is AI-generated. The first version contained only fictitious references. Even though its creator attempted to clean it up ([3]; I don't get what they mean by the word "potentially"), I discovered several statements with refs that do not support them, in a very superficial check. Janhrach (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Forum Ventures

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification, thus WP:DRAFTOBJECT applies. As presented is a failure of WP:NCORP. The sourcing is primary and PR churnalism, an amount of copyright violation from the sources is present, and the article is WP:ADMASQ 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Canada, United States of America, and New York. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Bunch of press releases, financial announcements, WP:ROUTINE coverage of VC-related news and executive interviews. Some sources do not mention Forum Ventures. A WP:ADMASQ that fails WP:ORGCRIT Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:13, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redbooth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I clearly see the sources are only about M&A, no purely CORPDEPTH coverage. Fails NCORP. Maybe someone will be able to fetch new sources, by gnews and other tools did not provide such World's longest edit (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:35, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously at AFD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:48, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jaakow Jicchak Szapira

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of coverage in his own right in sources, either in the article or via a Google search. The sources cited or available via a Google search are all simply records of graves or listings of rabbis, and are not of the kind that would establish notability under WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 10:39, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Judaism, and Poland. Shellwood (talk) 11:00, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found a source under the name of Yaakov Yitzchak of Blendov. Yeshivish613 (talk) 18:52, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:17, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The source above is pretty short, and I am unsure if it is reliable. Pl wiki has nothing better. It seems like a person that should be notable but right now we have little to go on, except primary sources. Pl wiki does have, in further reading, a two-page reference to a book - would be good to verify what's there. PS. I started AfD on pl wiki and asked for a scan of the pages; ping me if this is relisted/closed and I'll update on current progress. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:22, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:13, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frederik Batti Sorring

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. While the subject did serve as a regent (elected local official), per WP:NPOL holding such a position guarantee notability. Ckfasdf (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Indonesia. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:13, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

St. Joseph's High School, Briand Square, Bengaluru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fails notability owing to no WP:RS, WP:NHS and WP:GNG. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:21, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Karnataka. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:21, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tamanna Miah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant source that can demonstrate notability. The awards listed are also non notable and some with broken links. Rht bd (talk) 09:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh and United Kingdom. Rht bd (talk) 09:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:03, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

David W. Cloud

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

American Baptist pastor and theologian (BLP). The sources all seem to be academic references to his work (the kind of thing that any academic would have), or references to his own organisation (Way of Life). As previously tagged by another editor, there's not a single source here that provides significant coverage of the subject as such, and so this fails WP:BASIC. I don't think there's any basis on which he would meet WP:ACADEMIC either.

The article was previously deleted via an AfD in 2008. Dionysodorus (talk) 07:58, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that by now, the amount of referencing the person had was sufficient for inclusion, for example the sources of Straub, Jeffrey among others discussing his life and work without being merely brief in their descriptions. However, I may have been mistaken. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 08:51, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Straub discuses Cloud just for a few sentences, alongside several other people who probably wouldn't fulfil our notability guidelines (p. 50 here), and the other items cited all seem to be routine brief academic references, or work written by Cloud himself or his organisation. To meet WP:BASIC, we would need maybe two or three sources independent of Cloud that discussed him in detail in a way that implies recognition of his significance, which I don't think we have here. It would be good to hear what some other editors think though. Dionysodorus (talk) 23:17, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Christianity, and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously brought to AFD so Soft deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lê Tuyên Hồng Dương

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vietnamese medical doctor (BLP). I can see (with the help of Google translate) that the references are mostly just passing mentions or articles quoting the subject, so nothing amounting to significant coverage that would meet WP:BASIC. The only page actually focussing on the subject is this one (i.e. ref. 4 on the page), which seems to be a bio on a commercial website. Nor does the article list any specific achievement that would suggest notability. But I don't speak Vietnamese, so it may be that there is better coverage that I cannot identify. Dionysodorus (talk) 07:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:01, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:01, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:01, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Herman Moll (convict)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article largely uncited. The 2nd source is just a listing. A search in Australian database Trove yielded little. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 06:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, Germany, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 06:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Minor criminal; no sources that remotely amount to significant coverage in reliable sources under WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:BIO. Referenced. Hesperian 08:26, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio giuliano

07:28, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete Besides the lack of sourcing his prominence is hugely oversold. I'm not seeing the notability, and without sourcing it's going to be hard to get there. Mangoe (talk) 12:41, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I've done a bit of cleaning up of the page, although it has a long way to go if it is kept. Here is some newspaper coverage. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] – Ike Lek (talk) 22:26, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for analysis of above sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 07:02, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Wildman

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability requirements are much stricter since the first AfD in 2006. Article largely uncited. The inline source is just a directory listing. A search in Australian database trove yields just namesakes. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 07:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, England, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 07:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Minor criminal; no sources available that remotely satisfy WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:BIO. Referenced. Hesperian 08:22, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio giuliano

07:28, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Have any of the general references been checked? – Ike Lek (talk) 22:42, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 07:00, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sirb Productions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are passing mentions. Lack of in-depth coverage in numerous trustworthy sources. Fails WP:NCORP. Bakhtar40 (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Entertainment, Companies, and Saudi Arabia. Bakhtar40 (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:33, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IMIRAD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of independent notability for this non-profit organization. JTtheOG (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Organizations, and Washington, D.C.. JTtheOG (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jakub Wikłacz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NMMA because they are not ranked in the top ten in the world, with their current ranking being #77 in Bantamweight and their best ranking being #55 - see HERE. Subject also fails WP:GNG for not having significant coverage from independent. reliable sources where byt the sources talk about the subject in length and in depth, and not only passing mention. Sources about the subject, fight announcements, and fight results are all considered routine sport reports and cannot be used to contribute to meeting GNG requirements. Cassiopeia talk 23:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please truly understand the requirements of GNG and NMMA before you vote as some editors below vote keep without understanding the criteria instead just a fan of the sport/fighter. Note to closing editor and voter: AfD is based on meeting Wikipedia guidelines and not by number "keep" votes of not meeting the guidelines requirements. See required guidelines below:

1.WP:NMMA "Have been ranked in the world top 10 in their division by either Sherdog (sherdog.com) or Fight Matrix (fightmatrix.com)
2.WP:GNG Subject has significant coverage by independent, reliable sources, where by the sources talk about the subject in depth and in length and not passing mentioned for core policy of Wikipedia of verification.
3.Sources about the subject, fight announcements, and fight results are all considered routine sport reports and can NOT be used to contribute to meeting GNG requirements. Cassiopeia talk 23:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and Poland. Cassiopeia talk 23:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think this page should be deleted. He is a former KSW champion and will be competing in the UFC against a top competitor. Marty2Hotty (talk) 05:56, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- KSW is not a tier one champion title for such fails NMMA and the subject fails GNG. Competing against a top competitor has nothing to do with passing notability of NMMA and GNG in Wikipedia. Cassiopeia talk 08:20, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: He's fighting on UFC 320, and his addition to said card is mentioned in mainstream sources: Patchy Mix added to UFC 320, draws Polish UFC newcomer for second fight. Since he's a foreign competitor and this is his debut, the English language coverage is obviously limited. But after the fight happens his name will be all over the place in recaps of the show. So deleting his page a month ahead of that seems counterproductive. TheNewMinistry (talk) 13:30, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Your source Patchy Mix added to UFC 320, draws Polish UFC newcomer for second fight is was a fight announcement and that is considered a routine sport records and can NOT be used to contribute to NMMA or GNG. The subject is not even close to meet NMMA. You need to truly understand NMMA and GNG requirements. Cassiopeia talk 21:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I find this language inflammatory and in violation of Wikipedia:Assume good faith. You seem to be deleting notable fighters on technicalities and are getting defensive when questioned about it. Maybe rethink your approach here.TheNewMinistry (talk) 22:19, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - I assume good faith and not defensive as I state the notability of a subject (mma fighters) need to pass NMMA and GNG and not because one opinions or vote not based on NMMA or GNG guidelines as AFD is all about. Cassiopeia talk 22:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No one linked to an Instagram source. What are you even talking about? TheNewMinistry (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    My bad on that. Cassiopeia talk 23:15, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Don't understand why the ranking matters honestly. There are some fighter pages, where the fighter doesn't even break the top 100 yet their page is up. -XLM Boi 15:55, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- If any MMA fighter article do not meet NMMA (ranked top 10 or top tier have not been holding top tier titles), you can nominate for AfD. The NMMA criteria was changed a few years ago, that is the reason why you see some articles where fighters have not been ranked top ten are in Wikipedia mainspace. Cassiopeia talk 22:04, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - NMMA literally doesn't mean anything. The sport-specific sub criteria at NSPORT is just leftover stuff from before WP:NSPORTS2022 that wasn't "participation based" (all of the participation criteria was removed). None of the individual sport guidelines have been updated with replacement criteria so we're pretty much just left with skeletonized guidelines that offer unhelpful advice like "likely to be notable if they've been inducted into the hall of fame". ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:33, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    - We all know what happen before WP:NSPORTS2022 and after. All we can do is based on current NMMA criteria and it is not only the fighter who have inducted to hall of fame meet the NMMA but ranked world top ten in their division or who have been the champions in top tier (which means only in UFC). I have to say, the current NMMA criteria are displeasing to me and to any editors who support MMA, but it is what it is until the criteria change in the future.. Cassiopeia talk 23:28, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 22:13, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He fails to meet WP:NMMA and rankings do mean something. Boxing has relied on it for decades. However, for WP it's more important that he meets WP:GNG and my search for references did not find what I would consider to be significant and independent coverage. I found fight announcements, posters, results, and even interviews--but nothing to convince me WP:GNG is met. Of course I had to rely on machine translations since I don't speak or read Polish. Please let me know of anything that shows some WP notability criteria is met. Papaursa (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian order of precedence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List without any reference, created in 2006. Fails in WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Svartner (talk) 05:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Brazil. Svartner (talk) 05:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Lists. jolielover♥talk 08:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adarsh Anand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and ENT. Subject lacks independent multiple reliable sources. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, Internet, and Bihar. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:01, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The subject meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline as there are multiple reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage. For example:
[Source 1: https://news24online.com/entertainment/who-is-adarsh-anand-woman-accuses-youtuber-of-physical-assault-and-threats/531202]

[Source 2: https://www.etvbharat.com/hi/!entertainment/bhagalpur-social-media-influencer-and-mimicry-artist-adarsh-anand-unique-story-hindi-news-brn25073105406]

[Source 3: https://www.abplive.com/states/bihar/bihar-bhagalpur-adarsh-anand-met-with-pm-narendra-modi-he-shared-his-experience-2921923]

These demonstrate that Adarsh Anand has received coverage beyond routine mentions. The article can be further improved with references to strengthen it Yogiin (talk) 10:12, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject does not passes WP:GNG and WP:NBIO, as of now. Taabii (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jaime Vásquez (journalist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All coverage of the subject in the references or that I can find on Google pertains to his murder, and so the subject is probably not notable under WP:CRIME. Dionysodorus (talk) 21:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and Colombia. Shellwood (talk) 21:14, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as a WP:ATD? Can we move to Murder of Jaime Vásquez, or merge with Cúcuta? I'll do the work, if I know that I won't waste my time. Ping me. Bearian (talk) 03:00, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bearian: I see that Cúcuta has been covered recently in the British news on account of criminal gang violence (here), and if it's reached the British news I imagine it is probably well covered in the Colombian news as well. But our Cúcuta article doesn't mention this at all at present. I think that the Cúcuta article could be improved by adding a short paragraph mentioning the recent surge in violence more generally, and then briefly mentioning the murder of Jaime Vásquez in this context, but that would be more of a smerge than a merge: I don't think it would be balanced to incorporate more than one or two sentences on his murder in our Cúcuta article.

As for moving to Murder of Jaime Vásquez, I think that could potentially be a good solution. But does the murder meet WP:EVENTCRIT? Perhaps it would be best to wait to see whether anyone else here has any strong views on whether moving or deleting is preferable. Dionysodorus (talk) 07:51, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Bearian (talk) 12:27, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep UNESCO condemed his murder andv it seems to have gotten quite a bit of coverage in Latin America. I think the fact that he was a citizen jouranlist investigating corruption in Colombia who was then murdered for his work warrants a keep. Agnieszka653 (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Agnieszka653: I wonder if you are familiar with WP:CRIME and WP:1E? These policies make it clear that subjects who are known only for being the perpetrator or victim of a single crime are not eligible for articles of their own. There might be a case for moving the article to Murder of Jaime Vásquez if the event can be shown to meet WP:EVENTCRIT (per the discussion above), but an article on Jaime Vásquez as an individual person is unambiguously against policy (unless it can be shown that he is notable outside the context of this single event). Dionysodorus (talk) 17:41, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh--no I'm not. It appears though that his murder did garner moderate international--at least regional South American coverage. But yes I agree "Murder of Jaime Vasquez" makes more sense. Agnieszka653 (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chatcharn Buppawan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As with Kraidej Luelert (also just listed as an AfD), all coverage of the subject in the references or that I can find on Google pertains to his murder, and so the subject is probably not notable under WP:CRIME. Dionysodorus (talk) 22:30, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Crime, Laos, and Thailand. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:57, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the murder is notable per WP:NEVENT the suggested course at WP:BIO1E is not deletion but changing the article to be on the event. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:33, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear to me that the murder is sufficiently notable for its own article: rather, the incident is covered sufficiently in passing at Human rights in Thailand#Forced disappearances, Enforced disappearance#Thailand, and Surachai Danwattananusorn#Disappearance. We could redirect the page to Human rights in Thailand#Forced disappearances as an alternative to deleting, if that seems preferable. Dionysodorus (talk) 09:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As with Kraidej Luelert, the murders are notable, but should probably be covered together as part of the same event. The most detailed coverage is under Surachai Danwattananusorn#Disappearance, so maybe merging/redirecting there would be optimal. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:41, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Surachai Danwattananusorn. - Indefensible (talk) 03:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kraidej Luelert

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As with Chatcharn Buppawan (also just listed as an AfD), all coverage of the subject in the references or that I can find on Google pertains to his murder, and so the subject is probably not notable under WP:CRIME. Dionysodorus (talk) 22:30, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Crime, Laos, and Thailand. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:58, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the murder is notable per WP:NEVENT the suggested course at WP:BIO1E is not deletion but changing the article to be on the event. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:34, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear to me that the murder is sufficiently notable for its own article: rather, the incident is covered sufficiently in passing at Human rights in Thailand#Forced disappearances, Enforced disappearance#Thailand, and Surachai Danwattananusorn#Disappearance. We could redirect the page to Human rights in Thailand#Forced disappearances as an alternative to deleting, if that seems preferable. Dionysodorus (talk) 09:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As with Chatcharn Buppawan, the murders are notable, but should probably be covered together as part of the same event. The most detailed coverage is under Surachai Danwattananusorn#Disappearance, so maybe merging/redirecting there would be optimal. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:40, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:12, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Surachai Danwattananusorn. - Indefensible (talk) 03:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Helioplex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination rationale: Helioplex fails WP:NOTABILITY due to lack of significant coverage in independent sources. The article is a 2-sentence stub derived mainly from a template and lacks encyclopedic value. It exists only via cross-linking through Template:Johnson & Johnson, representing WP:SPAM and WP:PROMO concerns. The entry promotes Neutrogena's branded product rather than describing a notable chemical formulation. Per WP:NCHEM, this violates naming conventions for chemical compounds. See Talk:Helioplex#Removing Helioplex per WP:SPAM, WP:NOTPROMOTION, and WP:NOTABILITY violations for policy analysis. DemocratGreen (talk) 02:18, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For the record (since the talk page content will get deleted if the article does), here is the content at that talk page section:

	Text generated by a large language model (LLM) or similar tool has been collapsed per relevant Wikipedia guidelines. LLM-generated arguments should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Helioplex fails fundamental notability requirements and represents promotional content masquerading as encyclopedic material. The article is being considered for deletion under WP:AFD, and this section documents the rationale based on Wikipedia policy violations: 1. Notability Deficiency (WP:GNG): The Helioplex article is a 2-sentence stub with minimal sourcing, existing primarily because the Template:Johnson & Johnson artificially creates inbound links. Per WP:NOTABILITY, the subject lacks "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." No evidence of sustained attention from independent secondary sources exists. 2. Template-Based Link Farming (WP:SPAM): The article is included in a major corporate template that injects 50+ artificial links across unrelated Johnson & Johnson articles without substantive context. This is a violation of WP:SPAM, which prohibits "citation spamming" and use of Wikipedia to promote through link schemes. The inclusion appears driven by SEO/link farming concerns, not editorial merit. 3. Brand Name vs. Chemical Structure Violation (WP:NCHEM): Helioplex is a marketing name for a UV filter combo (avobenzone + oxybenzone), not a distinct chemical entity. It does not meet the bar for a standalone article under WP:NCHEM conventions. Other commercial filter names (e.g., Z-Cote by BASF) have been removed for identical reasons — being brand names without independent notability. 4. Promotional Content (WP:NOTPROMOTION): The page reads as a marketing blurb. Its widespread appearance via templates suggests intent to elevate a proprietary product brand under the guise of encyclopedic content. 5. Conflict of Interest (WP:COI): Editor User:Chefmikesf has declared a paid editing relationship with Johnson & Johnson on other talk pages. The inclusion of marginal brand names into high-visibility templates raises WP:COI concerns about promotional editing and undisclosed bias. Caution for Future Edits: Future attempts to include brand names into corporate templates like this one should be scrutinized carefully for notability, neutrality, and independence from corporate influence. Per WP:NCHEM, brand names for chemical formulations should redirect to the actual chemical compound articles (e.g., avobenzone, oxybenzone) and not exist as stand-alone entries unless they meet notability through independent sourcing. This article does neither, and its continued existence appears to function primarily as brand visibility support. –– ~~~~ DemocratGreen (talk) 02:20, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

It feels suspiciously like something generated by an AI, though. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:23, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant AI Geschichte (talk) 07:24, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 September 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:42, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it's just a brand-name, I can't find much, if any, independent sourcing (everything is either someone selling it, neutrogena talking about it, or a few things that look like press-release-generated stuff. And the article itself says almost nothing and has no functional sourcing. Elemimele (talk) 10:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Hefton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article for deletion because I am questioning the subject's notability. The few sources currently provided have reliability issues and are not placed or cited correctly. Much of the information appears to be unsourced or poorly sourced, which raises verifiability concerns. Without sufficient high-quality sources, the subject does not merit a standalone article per Wikipedia's inclusion standards.

GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 00:44, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I beilive the sources are reliable and the kickboxer is quite popular in the full contact kickboxing scene in the old school era as for the citation I’ll fix them. What do you think? If final decision comes to deletion I’d prefer moving it to draft.Judgejury28 (talk) 00:52, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Judgejury28, the sources are still not formatted properly and there is unnecessary spacing. Also, IMDB is not a proper source and the Vocal.media source isn’t even loading. Please fix these problems and try to find more reliable sources, thanks. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 01:52, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will and also help would be appreciated thanks for your time. Judgejury28 (talk) 02:26, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Sportspeople, Martial arts, and United States of America. Cassiopeia talk 02:55, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 September 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:47, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: none of the sources take Brad Hefton as the principal subject, but there are hits for him in several martial arts/sports magazines of the period (through Google Books). These are cursory mentions, and include nothing of sufficient substance to warrant an article. /over.throws/^✎ 20:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: IMdB is not a reliable source. Bearian (talk) 03:12, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV He has coverage on multiple pages in both Al Weiss' The official history of karate in America and The Martial Art Sourcebook. Appears to have won some significant titles in his sport. Lots of passing mentions in Blackbelt and Jet magazines in google books and some coverage in TV Guide magazine in the internet archive. A to Z of sport : the compendium of sporting knowledge names him specifically as a star athlete in its entry on the sport of kickboxing which I think makes him significant as a reference work is highlighting him as significant in the context of the wider sport. This book mentions him briefly but calls him "a kickboxing legend". His work as an actor in the film Blackbelt is covered in these film encyclopedias: [20], [21] In searching newspapers.com there are tons of hits on him. I didn't search much through the archive but got significant articles on him (I can't clip the way my access works, so apologies for not sharing) such as Mitchell, Kent (March 30, 1984). "Nice Guy Hefton is 'Bad' in the Ring". The Atlanta Journal. p. 81. and "PKA's Brad Hefton". The Monitor. September 18, 1984. p. 19. There are literally over 10,000 hits and as far as I can tell pretty much all related to him; although many are fight announcements or television appearance announcements. I would imagine if one hunts at least 20 or 30 articles with indepth text from early 1980s through the mid 1990s could be found. Best.4meter4 (talk) 22:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:41, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitri M. Johnson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual, sources do not establish notability and my WP:BEFORE did not turn anything additional up. The article was contributed by the subject's "literary agent/partner" according to the article for Story Kitchen, which is also going through AfD. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 23:53, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:36, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -a BLP which does not establish personal GNG and has the hallmarks of LLM ("pivoted"). The question here is "what has he done?", and is it Notable.

ChrysGalley (talk) 08:46, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -Just saw him announced as producing the new Tomb Raider show for Amazon, the Life is strange Square Enix adaptation earlier today for amazon, and season two of tomb raider animated for netflix. Those are major scripted tv shows and super notable intellectual property. Justthefacts911 (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (meant to bold, apologies, still learning) Justthefacts911 (talk) 22:09, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:PRODUCER. @ChrysGalley's questions are clearly answered by the article: the subject was producer on the items listed, and yes they were notable because they have lengthy standalone articles with references. - Indefensible (talk) 05:53, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - per WP:CREATIVE with a body of work linked in the article. (I didn't realize that WP:PRODUCER had become a shortcut...) Anyway, the current body of work seems to squeak by. He has more projects coming down the line, which don't currently factor in per WP:CRYSTAL, but he seems to be a key producer of TV/film content based on video games as most adaptations seem to have his name attached. -2pou (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: He is not listed as one of the producers at Sonic the Hedgehog (film) or the other film articles, suggesting that his involvement was limited. He is listed at https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3794354/companycredits/ as "DJ2 Entertainment", as one of ten production companies. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 08:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NPRODUCER and WP:GNG. He is listed as the sole producer for Rival Peak under dj2 Entertainment, but he is not the lead producer for any other project. At best, he is listed as one producer in a larger production team, e.g. for Life is Strange [22], the top-level producer is listed as Charlie Covell, while Johnson is only listed as one of three partners at Story Kitchen, along with other production companies. The significant coverage consists of routine company announcements and interviews. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 09:05, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually dj2 had both Dmitri Johnson and Dan Jevons. To be fair, Story Kitchen and dj2 are listed as lead producers for many upcoming films that are not currently in the article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Dmitri_M._Johnson), but these films are not currently notable, and Johnson is typically credited alongside multiple partners at the same company. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 09:28, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even worse, producers do not automatically pass WP:NCREATIVE even if they have been sole/lead producer for multiple notable projects (which is not true for Johnson). There needs to be independent significant coverage about their role in producing the films. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 16:55, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:41, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cezary Oleksiejczuk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NMMA because they are not ranked in the top ten in the world, with their current ranking being #74 in Bantamweight and their best ranking being #68 - see "HERE". Subject also fails WP:GNG for not having significant coverage from independent. reliable sources where byt the sources talk about the subject in length and in depth, and not only passing mention. Sources about the subject, fight announcements, and fight results are all considered routine sport reports and cannot be used to contribute to meeting GNG requirements. Cassiopeia talk 23:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please truly understand the requirements of GNG and NMMA before you vote as some editors below vote keep without understanding the criteria instead just a fan of the sport/fighter. Note to closing editor and voter: AfD is based on meeting Wikipedia guidelines and not by number "keep" votes of not meeting the guidelines requirements. See required guidelines below:

1.WP:NMMA "Have been ranked in the world top 10 in their division by either Sherdog (sherdog.com) or Fight Matrix (fightmatrix.com)
2.WP:GNG Subject has significant coverage by independent, reliable sources, where by the sources talk about the subject in depth and in length and not passing mentioned for core policy of Wikipedia of verification.
3.Sources about the subject, fight announcements, and fight results are all considered routine sport reports and can NOT be used to contribute to meeting GNG requirements. Cassiopeia talk 23:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and Poland. Cassiopeia talk 23:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Subject of article was just awarded a UFC contract and received significant independent coverage for doing so: Cezary Oleksiejczuk out to avenge brother Michal's loss, calls out Shara Magomedov, ‘I don’t love your age but…’ Dana White signs Sean O’Malley’s teammate and oldest contract winner ever. TheNewMinistry (talk) 13:51, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- Securing a UFC does not mean meet GNG or NMMA. Your source Cezary Oleksiejczuk out to avenge brother Michal's loss, calls out Shara Magomedov - it only state the subject in one very short paragraph (new feed) and not an article talk about him which is not considered significant coverage. Your second source ‘I don’t love your age but…’ Dana White signs Sean O’Malley’s teammate and oldest contract winner ever was a fight result and that is considered a routine sport records and can NOT be used to contribute to NMMA or GNG. The subject is not even close to meet NMMA. You need to truly understand NMMA and GNG requirements. Cassiopeia talk 21:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I find this language inflammatory and in violation of Wikipedia:Assume good faith. You seem to be deleting notable fighters on technicalities and are getting defensive when questioned about it. Maybe rethink your approach here. TheNewMinistry (talk) 22:18, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I assume good faith and not defensive as I state the notability of a subject (mma fighters) need to pass NMMA and GNG and not because one opinions or vote not based on NMMA or GNG guidelines as AFD is all about. Cassiopeia talk 22:54, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Being awarded a UFC contract doesn't make the subject notable at all. Many UFC fighters with many fights, still do not pass NMMA and GNG requirements. Lekkha Moun (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't understand why the ranking matters honestly. There are some fighter pages, where the fighter doesn't even break the top 100 yet their page is up. -XLM Boi 15:55, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- If any MMA fighter article do not meet NMMA (ranked top 10 or top tier have not been holding top tier titles), you can nominate for AfD. The NMMA criteria was changed a few years ago, that is the reason why you see some articles where fighters have not been ranked top ten are in Wikipedia mainspace. Cassiopeia talk 22:03, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep per WP:NPOSSIBLE. GNG-meeting sources existing seems pretty plausible based on the amount of internet coverage, and I don't think an extensive enough search has been done to rule out their existence. – Ike Lek (talk) 20:15, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Ike Lek Then you need to provide the sources to support your claim and not mainly state plausible source are out there and not mainly state "I dont think" so for a weak keep. Subject is need to be notable to be have a page in main space Wikipedia. Cassiopeia talk 21:57, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I understand that my argument would be more compelling if I went and found sources, but I am under no requirement to do so. Ike Lek (talk) 22:01, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Right, you are under no requirement to do so, and nobody will force you to provide sources, but if you don't, your vote holds absolutely no weight. Lekkha Moun (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  A lot less weight, sure, but "absolutely no weight" is a bit much. Ultimately, I'm just giving my input that I think there is a decent chance of being sources. I'm not really invested in what happens to his page and do not care about the subject in the slightest. Ike Lek (talk) 23:05, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ike Lek Then how can you say it the article to be kept then? Not support of sources to meet the GNG or NMMA guidelines for this is only your opinion and that is not valid reason to vote weak keep for article need to meet GNG guidelines to be in the main space and no the editor's opinion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassiopeia (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject is not yet notable. Completely fails WP:NMMA. Ranked #74 in world ranking Bantamweight and his best ranking was #68. Also clearly fails WP:GNG.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lekkha Moun (talk • contribs)
Delete He clearly fails WP:NMMA and has only one fight against a fighter ranked in the top 150 (with no fights in what we used to call a top tier organization). More importantly, I didn't see convincing evidence that either WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO is met. Fight coverage, announcements, even his UFC signing are not considered significant, independent coverage. Admittedly, I had to rely on computer translation to read most of the references. If someone can point me to the articles which show GNG is met, I will reconsider my vote. Papaursa (talk) 14:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I think it's fine to keep him. He is a champion in a former organization, brother of an established UFC fighter, just signed to the UFC and is about to compete. If he fails to establish himself as a top UFC fighter, I think he can be deleted. This is a tough one considering the fact that there are so many fighter pages with less. Marty2Hotty (talk) 22:09, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Marty2Hotty (1) his brother notability is not inherited to him under Wikipedia GNG or NMMA guidelines. (2) He is not a top tier champion. Even the champions of Bellator is not considered notable un NMMA let alone Polish organization Fight Exclusive Night promotor. (3) Signing to UFC is not equal to meeting NMMA. (4) Whether he can be ranked top 10 in the world in his division is a WP:CRYSTAL as he just to sign and even he could that will take many years to achieve the status. Your opinions as a fan fails to meeting Wikipedia WP:NMMA or WP:GNG guidelines which outlined by Wikipedia. Cassiopeia talk 22:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lakeport, Arkansas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NPLACE, since this location is not recognised by the Census, it needs to pass the WP:GNG. Almost all the sources that appear online are about the Lakeport Plantation, which already has a separate article. I couldn't find much to justify the notability of this article. – numbermaniac 08:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arkansas. Shellwood (talk) 09:19, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - On satellite view, there are some structures on this site. Searches on the internet bring back Lakeport Plantation, about 2.5 miles north. There is also a lake there called "Lakeport Lake". I'll change to "delete" unless others find something to indicate a former settlement. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:37, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rybka (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The significance according to Wikipedia rules is not shown and is not at all obvious. Violation of WP:AD. --Тихонова Пустынь (talk) 10:50, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 September 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 11:29, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Accuracy dispute???? Keep if awards and nominations are judged sufficient. Redirect to a list of animated films or Russian films, if not. - E.—UX 08:31, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this seems to have been reviewed in a couple of film blogs, but I'm not finding any actually reliable reviews or coverage of the film when searching under 'Rybka' or its Cyrillic transliteration. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:08, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:07, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:37, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fahad Saket

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT, only played 139 minutes of Stars League football per Soccerway (the rest on lower levels, and 0 minutes of continental football). Previously kept due to a guideline that was throw out the window. Creator can't respond - blocked indefinitely. Geschichte (talk) 04:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Qatar. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arghya Sengupta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails GNG. The bulk of sourcing consists of routine mentions, primary references, or self-authored works. While seems like marginally notable under WP:PROF, independent in-depth coverage about the individual is lacking. The article relies heavily on institutional affiliations and committee memberships without sufficient secondary sources to establish broad notability. Thilsebatti (talk) 00:29, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Law, and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 00:29, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Delhi, Karnataka, West Bengal, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:34, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I must respectfully disagree with the assertion that Arghya Sengupta fails to satisfy Wikipedia’s General Notability Guideline (GNG). Although it is true that many of the current citations on the page derive from Sengupta’s own publications—sources that were more accessible to locate—there nevertheless exists a robust corpus of independent, secondary media coverage demonstrating his public notability, much of which I have duly cited.

Sengupta has occupied a significant position within India’s legal-policy landscape for over a decade. He founded the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy in 2013, which The Economic Times has described as India’s “most influential legal think tank.” He has served on numerous "high-level" Government of India committees, contributed to the drafting of landmark legislation such as the Nuclear Liability Act, and represented the government in major judicial proceedings—including Binoy Viswam vs Union of India and Puttaswamy vs Union of India. While minute legal details of these cases may fall outside Wikipedia’s scope, what remains germane for the public record is Sengupta’s leadership in shaping the contours of India’s legal-policy sphere.

It is also pertinent to note that numerous Wikipedia entries for living persons persist with far fewer citations than those supporting Sengupta’s coverage—further underscoring that his page is no less deserving of inclusion than many already present.

Moreover, independent journalistic sources such as The Caravan provide valuable qualitative insights and substantiate his prominence. As one article observes:

“For some time now, technology-related policy-making started with a group of private entities … working with the government with exclusive access to data, to build software and applications. The code that is developed this way is then translated into law”—laws that Vidhi then helps formulate, almost exclusively. “The law is framed to cover and fix the vulnerabilities of the code” developed by these private entities."

Such commentary highlights the substantial influence wielded by Vidhi—and by extension, Sengupta—over India’s evolving data and privacy governance landscape.

Together with the economic, institutional, and judicial sources I have cited, these independent accounts affirm Sengupta’s notability under applicable Wikipedia standards:

1) The Caravan on Arghya Sengupta: https://caravanmagazine.in/technology/vidhi-aadhaar-aarogya-setu-arghya-sengupta-privacy-think-tank

2) The Economic Times on Arghya Sengupta and Vidhi: https://m.economictimes.com/prime/economy-and-policy/vidhi-inside-indias-most-influential-legal-think-tank/amp_primearticleshow/77749948.cms?

3) The Economic Times (b) on Arghya Sengupta and Vidhi: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/from-net-neutrality-to-ibc-aadhaar-how-vidhi-is-framing-key-government-legislation/articleshow/62357565.cms

4) The Telegraph on Arghya Sengupta and Vidhi: https://www.telegraphindia.com/my-kolkata/people/how-vidhi-centre-for-legal-policy-is-shaping-laws-in-india/cid/1990575

5) Open Magazine on Arghya Sengupta: https://openthemagazine.com/features/india/tender-loving-counsel/

6) Live Mint on Arghya Sengupta: https://web.archive.org/web/20240102094419/https://www.livemint.com/Leisure/nkLPCT9pz4n7fLD892gd9O/Vidhi-Centre-for-Legal-Policy--The-law-for-the-layman.html

7) A BBC article mentioning Arghya Sengupta: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-64372672

8) An EPW article which emphasises Sengupta's notability: https://www.epw.in/journal/book-reviews/incomplete-history-and-triggering-title.html

9) The Print on Arghya Sengupta: https://theprint.in/india/need-to-engage-with-constitution-not-worship-it-arghya-sengupta-on-the-colonial-constitution/1793790/

10) The Times of India on Arghya Sengupta: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/young-lawyers-impress-sc-in-privacy-debate/articleshow/59891294.cms

Select public interviews of the subject:

1) An interview of the subject by the renowned Indian journalist Karan Thapar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtXTk8Zs-ns

2) A long podcast interview of the subject by the Indian podcaster Amit Varma: https://seenunseen.in/episodes/2024/1/29/episode-366-arghya-sengupta-and-the-engine-room-of-law/

In conclusion, retaining the page on Arghya Sengupta, as a start class and even low-importance Wiki Project India article, would facilitate the continued incorporation of up-to-date and verifiable information about the subject's professional contributions, thereby ensuring that Wikipedia remains a reliable and comprehensive resource on India’s legal-policy landscape. Achintya2023 (talk) 08:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Achintya2023 is the article creator. Thilsebatti (talk) 10:21, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The sources cited do not establish the type of in-depth, independent coverage required by WP:GNG. The Print and Times of India pieces are routine mentions in the context of broader issues, not substantial biographical profiles. The listed interviews are primary/self-promotional sources (eg: Youtube), not independent secondary analysis. Routine visibility in panels, op-eds, or podcasts does not confer encyclopedic notability. Per WP:PROF, mere participation in debates or founding a think tank does not meet criteria without significant, sustained scholarly impact demonstrated through independent sources. The attempt to argue for retention by lowering the bar (“start-class, low-importance”) is not a basis for inclusion; notability is binary. Thilsebatti (talk) 10:21, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thilsebatti, thank you for noting the routine mentions in The Print and The Times of India. However, I would also like to draw attention to the other sources listed, which I believe add more substantive coverage. In line with WP:PROF, there does seem to be a reasonable body of independent sources discussing the subject’s work, several of which I have already cited in the original article. I would encourage fellow editors to review the article and the sources carefully and to exercise their own independent judgment before moving toward deletion. For context, there are also a number of other biographies of living individuals currently on Wikipedia with less clear notability that have nevertheless been retained. Achintya2023 (talk) 06:42, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 02:28, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - GNG "how" is seemingly there, but the Notability, so the "what for" is not present. So here we are on WP:BIO - three criteria are listed, and I can't get any RS fact into any of the three criteria. If we drill down to WP:PROF, which is a stretch since he's not fundamentally an academic, again no RS fact matches. He's not a judge, so that one is out. Looks like WP:PROMOTION to me, since there is not one adverse fact, this guy is purely legendary, as written. I would like to see more comments/SIGCOV via RS about what people say, or analyse, about him, rather than what he says. ChrysGalley (talk) 16:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrysGalley: Appreciate your thoughtful feedback! Let me address your points so that other editors can follow the discussion clearly.

First, on the question of what the subject is notable for: I have tried to emphasise that he is a prominent Indian lawyer, legal scholar, and an influential figure in the legal policy space. That said, I understand your concern that this could be made more explicit, and I am open to improving the emphasis so that the “what for” is clearer.

Second, regarding sources: I respectfully disagree that there are no independent, reliable sources. The references currently include critical coverage as well as neutral reporting. That said, I do recognise the importance of strengthening the article with further independent, secondary analysis, and I encourage fellow editors to add such material. I am also open to rebalancing the references—e.g., removing the subject’s own works and retaining only independent sources—to ensure the article adheres closely to policy.

Third, on the concern about promotional tone: I want to clarify that the article was created in good faith as a straightforward biographical entry, based on available material. The intent was not to present a “legendary” narrative, but to provide a structured overview of the subject’s career (à la an academic biography, in a linear fashion) and invite collaborative contributions. I acknowledge that including interviews and the subject’s own works may inadvertently give that impression, and I am open to trimming or adjusting such content in line with WP:NPOV.

In short, my goal is not to push a particular view of the subject but to document their career within Wikipedia’s guidelines, with input from other editors. If consensus is that the subject does not meet notability standards, I will of course respect that. But in the meantime, I hope we can work together to strengthen the article with reliable sources and balanced coverage. Achintya2023 (talk) 17:50, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:33, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Baldwin Island

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NATFEAT. "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. [...] If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river". The small island seems to be of little significance, with no hope of expanding it to an encyclopedic article. Geschichte (talk) 04:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, New York, and Islands. jolielover♥talk 04:25, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is nothing more on this island than the survey, and nothing notable about it. X2step (talk) 05:01, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akwu (name)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established per WP:NOTEVERYTHING. I was not able to turn it into a proper dab either, since we only appear to have Noah Akwu by that name (and the Akwu "article" is about a given name, not a surname.) Geschichte (talk) 04:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Africa, and Nigeria. jolielover♥talk 04:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 05:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Globe of Ukraine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphaned and bad, possibly machine translation. Not written well enough, possibly not notable. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Ukraine. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't fully tell due to the language barrier, but this appears to be a meme of some kind with the sources all blogs, user-generated content, and online stores to buy these kinds of globes. Open to reviewing high-quality sources (please ping me if you have some) but this really does not seem like a notable topic. Even if kept, it will need to be stubified to address the borderline incomprehensible translation. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no secondary sources with in-depth coverage in this article or the one in Ukrainian Wikipedia. The Russian version has the most extensive coverage. The typical usage is a mocking of Ukrainian nationalism, as is done in this 2000 article by Kommersant: And if its employees claim that Ukraine is actually shaped like a sphere, it means it's been scientifically established that a sphere is also shaped like Ukraine. In-depth coverage is provided in two blogs which are not RS, and by one journal article which may add to the notability, but this is not enough. Kelob2678 (talk) 07:37, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vivahiba

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This defunct Turkish 'citizen journalism' website appears to fail WP:GNG, the closest thing I could find that was close to SIGCOV was a short paragraph in this paper published by Freedom House, and even that's dubious because of how short it is. There's a couple of interviews with the two founders from 2013 when it was created (such as this in Milliyet) but nothing that even comes close to making this meet GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Internet, and Turkey. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bakhtiyar Tolegenov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. The added source is not SIGCOV and more about Floyd Mayweather Jr.. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 01:07, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing, Olympics, and Kazakhstan. LibStar (talk) 01:07, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He was the boxing champion of Asia and still gets coverage in Kazakhstan media to this day such as this or this (a major Kazakhstan station discussing "What is Bakhtiyar Tulegenov, who became famous after fighting with famous boxer Floyd Mayweather, doing now?" from a few years ago, showing lasting interest in his career) His Olympic fight received a decent amount of coverage in other countries such as the mentioned story; without a doubt Kazakhstan would have covered it given the U.S. had many stories on it. And I guarantee you 100% that the boxing champion of Asia was covered in Kazakhstan in the 1990s. We have not had any attempt whatsoever to search relevant archives. Deleting this continental champion without even attempting to look in archives does not improve the encyclopedia. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:29, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per BeanieFan. Svartner (talk) 00:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BeanieFan. Nomination is without merit. – Ike Lek (talk) 00:16, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We can't Keep this unless the sources provided SIGCOV have actually been located. It's unclear if this has occurred.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Please point to a policy explicitly stating it can't be kept without specific SIGCOV sources being located. That seems explicitly again WP:NEXIST. Ike Lek (talk) 02:27, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That would be because NEXIST "requires only that suitable independent, reliable sources exist in the real world", not that they may exist - flimsy "guarantees" by an user notwithstanding. More importantly, see WP:BLP. Geschichte (talk) 04:21, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NEXIST requires it to exist, not that it be located. Another quote from it is "Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article.", meaning that an article explicitly can be kept on the possibility of additional SIGCOV if there is consensus that doing so is appropriate based on the likelihood of existent SIGCOV. On top of that, NEXIST doesn't actually have to be met if there is consensus that a subject is notable regardless. We can disagree on some of the finer points of how this is applied, or ideologically how this should play out in AfDs, but the relist comment given by Liz in not based on policy. Ike Lek (talk) 13:15, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails NSPORTS. The sources presented are:

A passing mention of Togenov in a 1996 Bay Times article ("Floyd Mayweather Jr., of Grand Rapids, boxing, stopped Bakhtiyar Toleganov of Kazakstan in the second round in a preliminary featherweight bout.")
An interview with Tolgenov about the Mayweather bout. Not independent.
a TV interview with Tolgenov about the Mayweather bout. Not independent.

If these sources indicate anything, it's that Tolgenov is only really known for the Wayweather bout even in Kazakhstan because this is the only thing they mentioned when talking to him.

Find SIGCOV, then we'll talk. FOARP (talk) 08:37, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Randrianjatovo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod with reason: first Madagascar Olympian - coverage exists. Unable to find SIGCOV that would meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 00:52, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 00:52, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I guarantee you that the very first Olympian in the history of Madagascar has coverage. All of that coverage would be in Madagascar sources. Have you attempted to check Madagascar archives? BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:05, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Have you when you declined this prod? LibStar (talk) 01:23, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't answer my question. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:35, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why should a two-sentence article exist before someone has checked sources instead of after? Geschichte (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Because something is always better than nothing and we have an article now. BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:SIGCOV. We need evidence in hand with in-depth coverage. WP:MUSTBESOURCES arguments aren't valid or useful at AFD. The onus is on those wanting to keep the article to locate and identify WP:SIGCOV. I couldn't find anything other than passing mentions in sports almanacs. I'm open to a redirect as an WP:ATD if a suitable target is found. Perhaps a mention and redirect to Madagascar at the Olympics? If sources are located please ping me.4meter4 (talk) 05:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of EV charging stations in Ghana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flagrant violation of the WP:NOT test of WP:GNG; Wikipedia is WP:NOTDIRECTORY of EV charging stations, in Ghana or anywhere else. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:58, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Ghana. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:58, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NLIST and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 05:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:35, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clear cut case of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Ajf773 (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ashburton United Soccer Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG and largely depends on its primary source Uncle Bash007 (talk) 01:54, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Australia. jolielover♥talk 04:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see some local news in Australia for the club, nothing special. Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 07:27, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:35, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of shopping malls in Germany

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not encyclopedic; article is only a collection of links with no real sources. Appears to fail WP:LINKFARM. Ternera (talk) 16:00, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteWikipedia is not a Database, and not a place for a collection of links for large malls. It also fails the list criteria, as there is nothing to establish notability of this particular grouping. LightlySeared (talk) 22:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:HEY and the significant tightening of the list to meet the notability criteria by A. B., the current version passes notability, I think LightlySeared (talk) 22:48, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not only are there entries w/ articles, but also how is this particular example any different from the denizens of Category:Lists of shopping malls? No objection to deleting the smaller ones to avoid concerns about NOTDIRECTORY. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:40, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTYELLOW. Clearly no encyclopedic value (and very few notable entries for navigational purposes), just a collection of website links. Ajf773 (talk) 11:46, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments - LightlySeared said this is "not a place for a collection of links for large malls.". Heck, these aren't even large malls. The criteria of 5,000m² of gross leasable area is tiny. Even the Orchard Park Shopping Centre in remote Kelowna, BC (population <200,000) is 63,600m² and it's bigger than all but 21 of the 599 malls on this list. Only 19 entries are notable enough to have blue links.

Clearly the current list has issues but it can be fixed. The notability guidance for standalone lists (WP:NLIST) lists 2 requirements:

WP:NLIST #1 requires the overall topic -- German shopping malls as a group -- be notable. It is. Immobilien Zeitung, the German real estate magazine, frequently has articles on trends in the German mall business.^{[23][24][25][26][27][28]} Börsen-Zeitung, the German business newspaper, also carries periodic stories about German malls as a group.^{[29][30][31][32][33]}

WP:NLIST #2 requires individual entries either link to their own articles or cite reliable references if not notable on their own. This can be done with pruning in a few minutes. I'm happy to do it.

To make the list smaller and more manageable, I suggest we limit the list to a reasonable number of larger malls - either >50,000m² (48 entries) or >60,000m². That can also be done in a few minutes -- I've already got the draft on my laptop.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:34, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to trim the list to sensible criteria, I'd be more than happy to alter my recommendation to keep after the clean-up. I'd prefer the >50.000 m² as an inclusion criteria. LightlySeared (talk) 13:27, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While I like the idea of maintaining lists of buildings for architectural history I don't see much value in this list and it can probably be combined with another page on commercial architecture in Germany post WWII or something. Agnieszka653 (talk) 21:14, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Major revisions to the list:
- I changed the criteria from 5,000m² to 60,000m² gross leasable area
- I removed 569 malls. There are just the 30 largest left The list is 6308 bytes, not 63,000+.
- I ranked the malls by size
- Most of these malls are themselves notable on the German Wikipedia; I have begun interwiki linking entries to the German articles if we don't already have an English article.

As noted previously, there are multiple reliable references that refer to German malls as a group. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 22:36, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: given the major revision - which already switched one participants !vote, it seems like further discussion would be useful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:35, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep after revisions. Antibabelic (talk) 09:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, well done rewrite. Could see a bigger list than this, too. Maybe top 50 or top 100 or over 50,000m². Hyperbolick (talk) 09:34, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To the Rats and Wolves

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass WP:NMUSIC. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 01:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:NBAND#1 as all their albums have been reviewed. Quick searches in Metal.de [34][35][36] and Rockhard.de [37] brings us to six. [38] makes seven, etc. Geschichte (talk) 04:27, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany. jolielover♥talk 04:27, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: In addition to the reviews highlighted above, the band arguably meets NBAND#5, with 3 albums released by Arising Empire, who would fit the indie label criteria listed. Nil🥝 04:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James L. Hutson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass WP:NACADEMIC and WP:BEFORE does not turn up anything additional to establish notability. Article mostly reads like a CV. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 01:18, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.

Dr Hutson hasn't acquired any of the awards, positions, or achievements to fulfill WP:NACADEMIC.

The journal he is chief editor of doesn't count as major or well-established, as it only has 24 papers published (https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/ijedie/). I can't find any mentions of his academic or non-academic impact online either. Pastaman1a (talk) 01:51, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Technology, and Oklahoma. jolielover♥talk 04:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files

File:File name.ext

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=", and your reason just after "Reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 19 September 2025 (UTC) Error: You must replace File_name.ext with the actual name of the file you are nominating for deletion when using {{subst:ffd2}}. 2603:8083:DB40:C9:E0B8:BE41:45B8:A4D1 (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Screen capture of Joe Flanigan in 'Metascifi', a 2015 public artwork by Martin Firrell.jpg

Artwork derived probably from other non-free sources depicting actor Joe Flanigan, despite the artwork's copyright status. George Ho (talk) 11:11, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:TooManyWalls.jpg

This cover artwork was used only for promotional reasons in the United States--it was never released on CD there, so this artwork would not be recognized by many people. In other words, the image provides very little contextual significance (NFCC#8). The Australian artwork is similar but features a blue border, so this image won't suffice as a description of that region's artwork. Considering the commercial UK artwork is now in the article, the usage of this image seems to be excessive (WP:NFCC#3a). ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 11:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Protein-coding gene

Protein-coding gene → Human genome#Protein-coding genes (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Protein-coding genes → Human genome#Protein-coding genes (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Protein coding gene → Human genome#Coding sequences (protein-coding genes) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is certainly not exclusive to humans and should probably redirect to Gene. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 13:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Big gene

Big gene → Gene (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Originally merged into the target, this is no longer mentioned. "Big Gene" also appears to be a name of Gene Deal, as well as some character mentioned at List of Rolie Polie Olie episodes. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 13:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ras v12

Ras v12 → Gene (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Does not appear to be mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 13:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Undecaploid

Undecaploid → Polyploidy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Undecaploidy → Polyploidy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target. Occurs at Ploidy#Polyploidy, but I would argue that should be removed since there is barely any attestation for that term looking at a Google Scholar search (the more correct "hendecaploid" seems to be slightly better attested). 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 13:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities and towns in the Maldives

List of cities and towns in the Maldives → List of islands of the Maldives (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
List of towns in the Maldives → List of islands of the Maldives (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
List of cities, towns and villages in the Maldives → List of islands of the Maldives (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Deleting these redirects would be better as the Maldives officially don't have towns or villages so I don't see how anyone would search these. They do have cities but there is already an existing redirect for cities that redirects to the above targetted article. Unilandofma^Talk 12:47, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Walküre 699-035

Walküre 699-035 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 699-070 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 799-020 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 799 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 999-035 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 999 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599-028 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599-038 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599-085 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599-115 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 999-040 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 999 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 899-050 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 899 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 899-100 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 899 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 890-050 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 890 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 890-100 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 890 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 699 070 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 699 035 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 799 020 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 799 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 999 035 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 999 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 999 040 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 999 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599 028 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599 038 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599 085 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599 115 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 899 050 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 899 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 899 100 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 899 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 890 050 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 890 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 890 100 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 890 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 799/020 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 799 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599/028 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599/038 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599/085 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 599/115 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 699/035 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 699/070 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 890/050 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 890 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 890/100 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 890 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 899/050 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 899 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 899/100 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 899 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Walküre 999/035 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 999 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Subforms removed by me from the article at Special:Diff/1312217479 as being an indiscriminate list. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 11:11, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Friesland 1909791013

Friesland 1909791013 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 799 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Friesland 1809022613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Friesland 1809023613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Friesland 1709021613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Friesland 1709022613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Friesland 1709023613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Friesland 1709024613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
FPM 1909791013 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 799 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
FPM 1809022613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
FPM 1809023613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
FPM 1709021613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
FPM 1709022613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
FPM 1709023613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
FPM 1709024613 → Karlsbad-style coffee maker#Form 599 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Some sort of identifier numbers that were not mentioned in the article even before I removed an indiscriminate list of specific product forms at the target, apart from being included as comments in the source code. Unlikely and unhelpful for the reader anyway. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 11:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finger lock[ing]

Finger lock → Small joint manipulation (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Finger locking → Finger#Anomalies, injuries and diseases (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Finger Locking → Finger#Anomalies, injuries and diseases (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The article Hand does not contain the word "lock" or variations, potentially leaving readers not finding the information they are looking for. The article Small joint manipulation contains the word "lock", but not the phrase "finger lock". Not sure what the best path forward is for these. Steel1943 (talk) 22:41, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Trigger finger, perhaps? Tea2min (talk) 10:23, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Small joint manipulation which says "Most combat sports post-2015 have identified and limited definitions of small joint locks to finger and toe locks". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus yet on a specific target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 21:55, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget Finger locking and Finger Locking → Trigger finger. Nearly every hit on the first couple pages of Google refers to this. Sources aren't necessarily MEDRS but are public-facing, patient education sites reflecting common usage. "Locking" appears in the lead and in the description of signs and symptoms, including in the inbox ("prominent mention" is satisfied). Delete Finger lock. This form is far more vague and ambiguous. On Google this refers to using fingerprints to lock/unlock smart phones and other types of locks, some type of product I'm not familiar with, the self defense/martial arts move, this implement for banjo picking… --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 20:01, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 06:02, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anorexia (medical condition)

Anorexia (medical condition) → Anorexia (symptom) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Current target is Anorexia (symptom), but I think this disambiguator could also apply to Anorexia nervosa. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as per Clovermoss. The lead of Anorexia (symptom) states that it's a symptom that could 'indicate a serious clinical condition'. Thus, it is not a condition in and of itself. Since the redirect is looking for a condition, redirecting to Anorexia nervosa seems best. Katiedevi (talk) 03:47, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Katiedevi this is currently a redirect, do you mean “retarget” instead? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Brand new redirect with an implausible disambiguator. Anorexia already redirects to Anorexia nervosa. Presumably someone thought this would make it easier to find the page on the general term, which would make retargeting completely bypass that. But in that case, it's completely pointless, as someone is farrrr more likely to just look for "anorexia" in the first place. Even still, I think the fact that we're here shows that it's pretty vague, and best to just let hatnotes and dab pages direct people where they need; this redirect being here isn't going to make it any easier to find anything. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 06:13, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Big Fruit

Big Fruit → Beep (Bobby Valentino song) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

There are a lot of big fruits Duckmather (talk) 02:13, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Duckmather. Redirects are cheap and the phrase is present in the target page, but in this case it can also be misleading. Katiedevi (talk) 03:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or disambig. Big Fruit seems to be a very prolific producer of music with a Wikipedia article so they have a ton of mentions but no biographical detail anywhere I spotted. Redirecting to this (or any other) specific example of his work is not helpful. The number of mentions suggests that it might be worth investigating whether they are notable - 1 minute on google didn't turn up anything, but that's far from comprehensive or definitive. Separately, Big Fruit is the name of a sculpture with an entry at List of New Zealand's big things#South Island, an implied class of Australia's big things (see Big Orange (South Australia)), a type of candy manufactured in northern Italy (see Novi Ligure#Economy) and it is noted as the meaning of the specific epithet of Hopea megacarpa. Thryduulf (talk) 04:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frist Raid on Uchiza

Frist Raid on Uchiza → Internal conflict in Peru (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The word "First" is misspelled, and also no such raid is mentioned at the target, so I suggest deletion .Duckmather (talk) 02:10, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+1 LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 03:04, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Templates and Modules

Template:Hell (American band)

Template:Hell (American band) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two albums, WP:NENAN --wooden superman 13:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Created by bot

Template:Created by bot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Maintenance template newly created for use on just one article, with no evidence of any wikiproject consensus that it would be needed. As always, maintenance templates should not just be casually created on a lark -- because they require regular ongoing editor attention, there needs to be a consensus of editors that they're needed and will be used, rather than being created willy-nilly by just one editor for just one article.
Specifically, the problem here is that this template was coded to apply an Category:All pages created by bots tracking category that doesn't exist, as well as a dated-monthly Category:Wikipedia articles created by bots from August 2017 subqueue (which also doesn't exist, and would require the "all pages" tracking category to be populated into the thousands before it was justifiable) -- but precisely because maintenance templates generate process overhead like that, a wikiproject would need to establish a consensus that the new process and tracking queue were needed.
Further, we already have numerous cleanup and maintenance templates to track the various individual issues that bot creation can cause, so it's much more useful to tag for those specific problems than it would be to just indiscriminately track bot creation as its own standalone thing. Bearcat (talk) 13:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Contradicts other

Template:Contradicts other (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Contradicts others (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Contradicts other with Template:Contradicts others.
These templates were created in 2005 and 2010 but have become redundant. Apparently the "other" template was made for referring to one article, and the "others" template was made for referring to multiple. However, this seems moot now as the doc page of the "others" template shows accommodation for a single article entry. Proposing to merge "other" into "others". Left guide (talk) 08:00, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellany

Deletion review

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creating articles Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and voting	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Files

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:Belgian neo-Nazi propagandists

Category:Hypnotics and sedatives

Category:Islamists from Cairo

Category:People from Bulaq

Category:Zimbabwean veterans activists

Category:Iranian blind musicians

Category:Drug classes defined by psychological effects

Category:Writers in Maithili

Redirects

Protein-coding gene

Big gene

Ras v12

Undecaploid

List of cities and towns in the Maldives

Walküre 699-035

Friesland 1909791013

Finger lock[ing]

Anorexia (medical condition)

Big Fruit

Frist Raid on Uchiza

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

Deletion review