Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria. Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and another review process at the same time. Nominators who have previously successfully nominated a list may have two concurrent featured list nominations only if the first active nomination has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and Hey man im josh, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews: actionable objections have not been resolved in a timely manner; or consensus for promotion has not been reached after significant time; or reviewers are unable to judge whether the criteria have been met. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the process focuses on finding and resolving problems in relation to the criteria, rather than asserting the positives. Declarations of support are not as important as finding and resolving issues, and the process is not simply vote-counting. Once the director or a delegate has decided to close a nomination, they will do so on the nominations page. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived, typically within the day, and the {{FLC}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the {{Article history}} template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.  – Table of contents – Closing instructions

Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists ← Featured pictures Featured topics Featured list tools: Featured list criteria Featured list candidates Featured list removal candidates Featured list statistics Wikipedians by promoted featured list nominations Today's featured list This month's queue TFL submissions TFL statistics Featured lists that have appeared as TFL Featured lists yet to appear as TFL Featured list log Random featured list Former featured lists Removal candidates log

Nomination procedure Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the FL criteria and that any peer reviews are closed and archived. It is recommended that the list have no other open discussions. Place {{subst:FLC}} on the talk page of the nominated list. From the FLC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please leave a post on the FLC talk page for assistance. Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with ~~~~ and save the page. Finally, place {{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/name of nominated list/archiveNumber}} at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of this page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated list. When adding a candidate, mention the name of the list in the edit summary. Reviewing procedure Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination. To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the list nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FLC page). To support a nomination, write * '''Support''', followed by your reason(s). If you have been a significant contributor to the list before its nomination, please indicate this. Supports are weighted more strongly if they are given alongside justifications that indicate that the list was fully reviewed; a nomination is not just a straight vote. To oppose a nomination, write * '''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the director may ignore it. Please focus your attention on substantive issues or inconsistencies, rather than personal style preferences. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed, and nominators are encouraged to use {{reply to}} or other templates to notify reviewers when replying. To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s> ... </s>), rather than removing it. If a nominator feels that an oppose vote has been addressed, they should say so, rather than striking out the reviewer's text. Nominators should not cap, alter, strike, or add graphics to comments from other editors; replies are added below the signature on the reviewer's commentary. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page. Graphics (such as {{done}} and {{not done}}) are discouraged, as they slow down the page load time. To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write * '''Comment''' followed by your advice.

Nominations urgently needing reviews edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so: List of presidents of Dartmouth College (FLC) Swedish Figure Skating Championships (FLC) List of caviids (FLC) List of protected areas of Peru (FLC) List of heteromyids (FLC) List of works by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (FLC) edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago:

Nominations

List of constituencies of the Goa Legislative Assembly

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

The 8th in the Indian constituency series from what is probably India's best-known state, Goa. I've improved the lead and added a history section, and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Telangana. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

World Junior Figure Skating Championships

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

This is the fourth of the four major ISU figure skating competitions. The results are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, a well-sourced history is provided, the sources are properly formatted and archived, and relevant photographs are used. Additionally, I have already adapted changes that were requested on similar articles to this one so as to avoid previous issues. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Natalia Krestianinova and Alexei Torchinski of the Soviet Union, and Sui Wenjing and Han Cong of China, are tied" - don't think those commas are needed You may be right, but I don't like all of those ands in a row.
  • How about "Natalia Krestianinova and Alexei Torchinski of the Soviet Union are tied with Sui Wenjing and Han Cong of China for the most titles in pair skating".....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

• I can do that, but what would you recommend for instances where there are more than two teams tied (which I have in other competitions)?

• I just realized I use a different structure when there are three or more ties. I have altered the sentence per your recommendation, which is better.

• The one-sentence paragraph in the history section looks a little odd. Maybe attach it to the end of the one before....? I have joined it to the following paragraph, but also re-edited it to make it flow better. Let me know what you think.
• "while a points system allows member nations to enter additional competitors or teams" - the word "while" is not appropriate there and can be removed  Done
• Don't think a "see also" for World Figure Skating Championships is needed as it's linked in the prose  Done
• That's all I got - nice work as ever! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

User:ChrisTheDude: I have addressed your feedback. Thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:58, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

User:ChrisTheDude: I have addressed your follow-up feedback. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:32, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:57, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you so much! Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

List of Billboard Tropical Albums number ones from the 1990s

Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 01:50, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

After getting List of Billboard Latin Pop Albums number ones from the 1990s FL, I wanted to get into the tropical side of the 1990s once more. As always, I look forward to addressing any issues brought up in the comments. Some of albums I remember from my days living in New Jersey during in the 90s. Ah the memories... Erick (talk) 01:50, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Tropical Albums (formerly known as Tropical/Salsa Latin Albums), is a chart " - no reason for that comma after the brackets
• "Since its inception, the chart had been published on a fortnightly basis with its positions" => "Initially, the chart was published on a fortnightly basis with its positions"
• "basing it on electronic point of sale data" => "based on electronic point of sale data"
• "and was the bestselling tropical of 1990" => "and was the bestselling tropical album of 1990"
• "tied for the most number one albums of the decade" => "tied for the most number-one albums of the decade"
• "Merengue music, which rivaled salsa music in the 1980s,[16] also saw its popularity rise in the 1990s" => "Merengue music, which rivaled salsa music in the 1980s,[16] saw its popularity rise in the 1990s"
• "Juan Luis Guerra, was credited" - no reason for that comma
• "outside of the working-class" => "outside of the working class"
• You use both "best-selling" and "bestselling"
• "Cuban music saw a resurgence in mainstream interested" => "Cuban music saw a resurgence in mainstream interest"
• "second bestselling Latin album of all-time " => "second bestselling Latin album of all time "
• "as the bestselling world album of all-time" => "as the bestselling world album of all time"
• Ref 1 gives an error -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Thanks for the comments! Let me know if I missed any! Erick (talk) 17:43, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• All the images are missing alt texts. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:24, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Wicked (2024 film)

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 08:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Wicked is a 2024 American musical fantasy film directed by Jon M. Chu and written by Winnie Holzman and Dana Fox. It adapts the first act of the 2003 stage musical by Stephen Schwartz and Holzman, which in turn is based on Gregory Maguire's 1995 novel. A re-imagining of L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and its 1939 film adaptation, the film follows Elphaba Thropp (played by Cynthia Erivo), the future Wicked Witch of the West, and her friendship with her classmate Galinda Upland (played by Ariana Grande), who becomes Glinda the Good, before Dorothy Gale's arrival from Kansas into the Land of Oz. This is my twelfth film accolades list to be nominated for featured list status, and I largely based the format off of the accolades lists for The Artist, Barbie, The Big Short, CODA, Dune, Dunkirk, If Beale Street Could Talk, 1917, Oppenheimer, The Shape of Water, and Slumdog Millionaire. Birdienest81talk 08:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• Is there a way to vary the language of the image caption so as not to say "received accolades" three times in one sentence?
• Jo McLaren's name sorts incorrectly
• Note d should not have a full stop -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done - I have read your comments and have made corrections based off of them. Thank you for your feedback.

--Birdienest81talk 09:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:54, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• The scope for the header cells that span multiple rows should be "rowgroup". e.g. Academy Awards.
• rowspan="1" can always be eliminated. That is the default. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:32, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

List of BoJack Horseman episodes

Nominator(s): Crystal Drawers (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because the series holds a special place in my heart and I’d like to see it gain another FL. I’ve modeled it mainly after List of Cobra Kai episodes, but also used other featured lists as a reference. I’m hoping to get this promoted in order to continue my work towards a featured topic of BoJack's seasons. I tried to use only the most high quality sources when citing, and tried to make each paragraph in the lead brief yet comprehensive. Fire away! Crystal Drawers (talk) 19:00, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Over the course of six seasons, 76 episodes of BoJack Horseman were released between August 22, 2014, and January 31, 2020[2][13]—including one standalone Christmas special." => "Over the course of six seasons, 76 episodes of BoJack Horseman were released between August 22, 2014, and January 31, 2020,[2][13] including one standalone Christmas special."
• "Each subsequent season would receive universal acclaim" => "Each subsequent season received universal acclaim" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:22, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: thank you for the comments, they have both have addressed :) Crystal Drawers (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Adaptations of Manon Lescaut

Nominator(s): ~ L 🌸 (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

After reading a lot more French literary criticism than I expected, I am confident that this is a fully complete and comprehensive list of adaptations of the tragic love story Manon Lescaut. (I split it out from that article, where I first wrote it, for better summary style.) This is my first FL nomination so I am very eager for feedback! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

Considering I have a background in French Literature, I figured I should assist with this review, though my focus was 19th century and not 18th century. Also, I was not familiar with this work prior to this article.

• I've not heard the phrase "without marriage" versus "outside of marriage".
• You have some British spellings (ie. "humour") and some American spellings (ie. "dramatize"). You should pick one and stick with it.
• "These operas varied widely..." I would say they "vary" widely since they presumably still vary.
• "In the theatrical and operatic adaptations, Manon's three lovers are combined into just one." I recommend perhaps modifying the end of the sentence to clarify "one character".
• Is there a wikilink for "cinemofono"? I'm guessing if there were one, you'd have used it.

User:LEvalyn: Overall, the article is very well written, as you can see by the very small number of recommendations I have. Please let me know if you have any questions! Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:48, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your comments, I appreciate it! For the first item, I changed to "without marrying" because something about the phrase "outside of marriage" bothers me; let me know if that still sounds off to you. Also, alas, my own native EngVar is an abominable combination of British and American, both "humour" and "dramatize", ie, Canadian English; regrettably, the article is currently consistent. Your other notes I have addressed as you suggest. Nothing to wikilink for cinemofono; I haven't been able to turn up any information about it, really. Thank you again for taking a look! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 01:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

I will trust you when you say the English is consistent with Canadian English. The rest is good. I am happy to support. I will also come back to do the source review for you in a few days. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Key scenes that thteey consistently include are the reconciliation at Saint-Sulpice, the scene with the Italian prince" - sould you give a tiny bit more context to this? Who is reconciled? Who is "the Italian prince"? This sentence seems to assume a level of knowledge of the story which nothing up to this point in the article has imparted
• Notes 6, 10 and 13 are sentence fragments so should not have full stops -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

  Great point about those plot details, thank you-- I've added more context. Please let me know if it still feels unclear, or if you think the article would benefit from including a longer summary of the novel's original plot. I've also removed those full stops. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

List of Gold Coast suburbs

Nominator(s): Idiosincrático (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

The Gold Coast is a city and local government area in Queensland, Australia and is divided into 81 suburbs and localities (they're virtually the same). It's an amazing city which, from what I often see, is not well known outside Australia. Beaches, mountains, rivers, high-rises, Monaco-esque marinas, and woeful housing affordability, what more could you want! Idiosincrático (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Steelkamp

I'll review this. Steelkamp (talk) 15:43, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Bgsu98

Note: The following were originally posted as a drive-by comment:

• The table looks to be mostly formatted correctly, but ensure that all of the columns have appropriate column scopes. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:46, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

  Column scopes fixed, cheers! Idiosincrático (talk) 04:42, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

  Great! I will look at the article more closely this weekend... Seems like an interesting topic. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:15, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Additional comments

• What is meant by "gazetted"?
• The city's divisions are gazetted into 52 suburbs (urban areas) and 29 localities (rural areas),[6] they are stretched from the Queensland state border to the south, the Coral Sea to the east, the Albert River to the north and the Gold Coast hinterland and Scenic Rim to the west. – That comma after (rural areas) is inappropriate. Use either a semicolon or separate into two sentences.
• The largest division is the Southern Moreton Bay Islands locality (83.9 km2), it is also the only unpopulated division. Again, inappropriate use of a comma. Recommend use of a semicolon.
• Is "PO Box" is preferred abbreviation for post office box in Australia?
• The table has a column for locality v. suburb, but what is the difference between these two designations?
• Recommend flipping the 2016 census and 2021 census columns. As currently presented, the math is backwards when calculating the change.

User:Idiosincrático Please let me know if you have any questions! Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:46, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Image review

Very happy to see this in FLC, been to a few of them before to see relatives. Also my first time conducting an image review, so patience is appreciated. Icepinner 13:50, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

• File:Gold Coast suburbs map.jpg — CC BY SA 3.0
  • This could benefit a caption. It probably wouldn't need ALT text cause it would just be the same thing Needs ALT text
• File:CSIRO ScienceImage 7482 Highrise development at Southport Queensland.jpg — CC BY SA 3.0
  • Needs ALT text. Can the image description be changed so that it isn't a direct copy paste from the website?
• File:Surfers Paradise, QLD skyline.jpg
  • Needs ALT text
• File:Broadbeach skyscrapers, Gold Coast, Queensland, 2020, 01.jpg
  • Needs ALT text

That's all I have. Location of the photographs may not be necessary since the description parameter already does the job. Icepinner 13:50, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Alt-texts are required even if they are similar to the captions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for the clarification. Icepinner 00:55, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

@Icepinner: – All addressed, thank you for the review. Idiosincrático (talk) 04:49, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, passing image review. Icepinner 06:59, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments by SounderBruce

• First paragraph could be fleshed out with some basic details about the city as a whole (total population, rank among Australian and Queensland cities, total area, etc.) to provide context.
• Consider changing up the first sentence of the second paragraph, which repeats "The City of Gold Coast".
• Link to the term "gazetted"?
• "they are stretched" is awkward, perhaps "they stretch" to maintain the tense?
• The areas should use {{convert}} to add square mile figures.

That's all I have from my first pass. SounderBruce 23:12, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in Colombia

Nominator(s): Tone 20:43, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Colombia has 9 World Heritage sites and 13 tentative sites. Standard style. The list for China is already seeing support so I am adding a new nomination. (It took me a while to address the comments for China since that list is massive, but this time it is a bit shorter nomination.) Tone 20:43, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• In the map, could you use red to represent cultural sites, green to represent the two natural sites and blue to represent the mixed sites. Then you could replace the sites with multiple locations which use green and blue with turquoise or purple or orange, your choice. This is common in most other maps for lists (as you know)
• "World Heritage Committee three times" could you specify all times
• a Pleistocene refugium" → "refugium during the Pleistocene" per MOS:SOB
• "the site was listed as endangered upon" → "the site was listed as endangered, after"
• "The situation has improved by 2015" → "The situation improved by 2015,"
• "in 1540 as" → "in 1540, as"
• "Spanish colonization of the region" link to Spanish conquest of the Muisca. I think that Spanish colonization of the Americas would be too broad and that Spanish conquest of New Granada is the wrong region.
• "The tombs are often decorated with polychrome paintings with geometric designs or animal and human motifs, and with stone carvings. " → "The tombs often feature polychrome paintings with geometric designs, animal and human motifs, and stone carvings. " I think "or" can be removed unless you're saying that they featured either the geometric designs or motifs with stone carvings. If all of them are carved in stone, then I'd just add "stone-carved" after "feature"
• "aggregations" link to Shoaling and schooling
• "marine life," I think a colon would work better instead of a comma since a lengthy dependent clause follows
• the hammerhead sharks" singular works better
• "Spanish influences" link to Spanish Colonial architecture if this was specifically during the colonial period, otherwise Spanish architecture works
• "Department who" comma before who
• "sombrero aguadeño" this is directly linked to spanish wiki but per H:FOREIGNLINK you should use Template:Interlanguage link
• "The site is shared with Argentina (a section pictured), Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, and Peru" link al the countries? optional but maybe helpful
• Link "endemic" to Endemism, unfamiliarity
• "rock art through millennia" for instead of through is more common, I am not sure about this use of through
• "The paintings include scenes with dances, battles, and ceremonies, as well as depictions of plants and animals. " remove "scenes with" and "depictions of"
• "indigenous communities" link to Indigenous peoples in Colombia
• "The canal connects Cartagena, Colombia's main port, with the Magdalena River, country's main river, which however is not navigable in its delta due to obstacles" → "The canal connects Cartagena, Colombia's main port; with the Magdalena River, country's main river; which, however, is not navigable in its delta due to obstacles" Please use semicolons for complex lists where appropriate, I have seen some other instances in the main list section. Please double check
• "because of lack" → "due to a lack" should use a, due to is less repetitive
• "an engineering challenge" → "an engineering challenge due to its scale" is in source and adds detail
• redlink "Fritz Karsen " and link to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Karsen using aforementioned template

Glad to see you active again, nice list, mostly nitpicks. I might continue my review later. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 01:06, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

• "which is a World Heritage Site" link "World Heritage Site" to [[List of World Heritage sites in Venezuela and make the "Site" lowercase as that is what Wikipedia predominantly uses and what the article itself predominately uses.
• "agriculture, however" → "agriculture. However"
• "gold smiting" → "gold smithing"
• "Gabriel García Márquez, the workers"→"Gabriel García Márquez; the workers"
• "the third largest bridge in the world " link this to List of highest bridges or List of longest bridges or List of tallest bridges depending on what made it the largest
• "people mostly of African descent" link to Afro-Colombians
• "those from Mesoamerica" link to Mesoamerican architecture
• "marine invertebrates" link to marine invertebrates
• "evolution of life" link to Evolution of life
• "Museum"→"A museum" (sentence fragment rn)
• File:Colombia location map.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Baluarte de Santo Domingo, Cartagena 01.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Rio Atrato.JPG - PD
• File:Santa barbara dia.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Tombs in Tierra Dentro.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Parque Arqueológico de San Agustín - Tumb with deity.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Malpelo island NOAA.jpg - PD
• File:Cafetales, en Colombia.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Jujuy Sección Quebrada Grande-Las Escaleras, Foto 1 (14960178156) (2).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Chiribiquete view.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:ESC large ISS006 ISS006-E-14568-NurSanAndres.jpg - PD
• File:Abrazo del sol al rio.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Plaza Che, Bogotá.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:YAEL PHOTOS 898.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Puente de occidente en santa fe de antioquia.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Puente en zona de palafitos en Nueva Venecia-Sitionuevo-Magdalena-Colombia.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Ccggm Btá.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Platyceras Floresta.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• suitable alt text for images, pass image review. Waiting for a comment on prose, @Tone: 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 16:04, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

List of Olympic medalists for Malaysia

Nominator(s): 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 06:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because this list is a comprehensive and accessible list which is worthy of FL status. This list mentions all of Olympic medalists from the main Olympics, Youth Olympics, and demonstration games. All of the content in the list is sourced, and it has an engaging lead and history section. It also is accessible with recommendations from my previous nomination. I created and nominated this list because of a support vote from the previous nomination. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 06:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Malaysia made its debut at the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics, the delegation did not gain a medal in their first five participations" => "Malaysia made its debut at the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics, but did not gain a medal in their first five participations"
• There's no reason to have a capital B on badminton (this occurs in multiple places)
• "The delegation never gained a gold medal" => "The delegation has never gained a gold medal" (unless Malaysia has permanently stopped entering the Olympics)
• Link Malaysia in body as well as lead
• Link Razif and Jalani Sidek in body as well as lead
• Link 1956 Summer Olympics in body as well as lead
• Can we explain briefly why Malaysia did not compete at the Olympics until 1956?
• "After a 12-year drought of medals in the 2000 and 2004 Olympics," - this reads weirdly. Suggest simply "After failing to win any medals at the 2000 and 2004 Olympics,"
• "through Lee Chong Wei, who nearly won against Lin Dan." - who nearly won what event? How did Wei "nearly win"? Who is Lin Dan?
• "gained the first bronze medal in Diving that same year" - no reason for capital D on diving
• "four silver medals and one bronze medal was gained" => "four silver medals and one bronze medal were gained" ("was" is the singular form of the noun so not appropriate when the subject is plural)
• "In the 2020 Olympics, a bronze medal and a silver medal was gained" - same here
• "the silver being the first silver medal for Cycling through Awan" - no reason for capital C on cycling
• "The delegation never gained a gold medal" => "The delegation has never gained a gold medal"
• Awang image caption should show his name in full and not have a capital C on cycling
• Tables should sort based on surname, not forename
• "Malaysia had three medals from participants in a Mixed team" => "Malaysia has three medals from participants in a mixed team"
• Also, at which Olympics (youth or "normal") were the mixed team medals gained?
• "Malaysia gained three silver medals and four bronze medals from demonstration sports; the following are medalists in the demonstration games:" => "Malaysia has gained three silver medals and four bronze medals from demonstration sports." (no need for the "the following....." bit)
• As an aside......"I created and nominated this list because of a support vote from the previous nomination" - as per the instructions at the top, you should not nominate another article until the previous one has substantial support, not just a single !vote, but I had already written all those comments above before I noticed this, so I will leave them here anyway -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Fixed everything except:

  • Badminton capitalization on tables: I think this is suitable already.
  • Explanation on how Lin Dan nearly won: I do not think it is mentioned in the source.

  • Then remove it, without more info it isn't really very helpful to the reader. You also haven't added what event this relates to -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:34, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

  Fixed. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Tables should sort based on surname, not forename: In Malaysia, there is no surname or forename.
  • Olympics for Youth: I thought they were already mentioned by the year column.

  🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 13:09, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• I made some cosmetic adjustments to the table for you. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:19, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Crystal Drawers

1. The word "gain" is used three times very close to eachother in the lead, could you replace at least one of them?

2. "in the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics at Melbourne sending a total of 32 athletes" - change to "in the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics at Melbourne, sending a total of 32 athletes"

3. "first silver medal from Cheah Soon Kit and Yap Kim Hock who participated in badminton…" - change to "first silver medal from Cheah Soon Kit and Yap Kim Hock, who participated in badminton…"

That's it, I’ll check the article again once these issues are fixed and hopefully support Crystal Drawers (talk) 12:24, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

@Crystal Drawers: fixed. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Excellent! Very nice job on the list, happy to support

Also, consider checking out my FLC (if you have the time, of course, no pressure!) Crystal Drawers (talk) 12:37, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

List of Billboard Adult Contemporary number ones of 1998

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Here's #38 in this series of lists. This particular year was notable in one large part for one "titanic" chart-topper. Feedback as ever will be gratefully received and quickly acted upon...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• The track would prove to be - Maybe went on to be?
• when Savage Garden broke its own record - Would it be possible to state which song they broke the record with?

That's all I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 08:51, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

@Alavense: - thanks for your review, both points addressed! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Good job. Happy to support. Alavense (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• The Shania Twain image is missing alt text.
• I couldn't find any other problems. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824: - whoops! Now sorted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Crystal Drawers

Very interesting list, will add my thoughts soon. Please ping me if I have not done so by Thursday. Warm regards, Crystal Drawers (talk) 00:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

1. The way numbers are written is inconsistent. Some numbers are written out (like “ten”) and others are expressed numerically (like “21”). I’d advice changing this to keep a better flow

A MOS page which I can't find right now says that numbers up to ten should be be written in words and higher numbers as digits -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Apologies as I’m not too familiar with stuff like that Crystal Drawers (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

2. "In the year's first issue of Billboard the number one…" - change to "In the year's first issue of Billboard, the number one…"

3. "by the British singer Elton John" - change to "by British singer Elton John", this might be more personal preference than anything so feel free to ignore

I have been advised in the past not to write like that as it creates a "false title" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Got it, no issue there Crystal Drawers (talk) 12:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

4. "before it was displaced by "My Heart Will Go On" by the Canadian vocalist Celine Dion" - change to "before it was displaced by Canadian vocalist Celine Dion's "My Heart Will Go On"" in order to have the sentence flow better

5. "also spent ten weeks at number one. It dominated radio" - add a semi-colon between "one" and "it" as they would flow better as one

6. "latter a duet with the American artist R. Kelly" - same as with suggestion #3, feel free to ignore if you’d prefer not to

See above -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

7. "The former song also topped" - change to "The former also topped" as to not overuse words too much

8. "Twain had experienced considerable success since 1995, but it was her first entry…" - remove "but" and add a semi-colon between "1995" and "it"

And that’s it. Not that many issues, I feel the list is ready for FL status, and my suggestions were mainly just nitpicks Crystal Drawers (talk) 10:51, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

@Crystal Drawers: - thanks for your review. Actioned other than as noted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Support, very nice work Crystal Drawers (talk) 12:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Older nominations

List of World Heritage Sites in Palestine

Nominator(s): User:Gerald Waldo Luis

Another World Heritage Site list which will (hopefully) become a Featured List. Palestine has five Sites that are already inscribed, with 13 on the tentative list. The list follows the typical World Heritage Site list structure, modeled specifically after the Egypt list. Due to Palestine's unique relationship with UNESCO, due to the Arab-Israeli conflict, Gerald Waldo Luis has included two paragraphs in the lead to address those. Therefore, this also includes some secondary coverage, mostly in the last paragraph of the lead. As Gerald has done most of the work, but has not been active for some time, I have decided to nominate it for him. I look forward to addressing your comments, thank you. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 02:21, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi Easternsahara, thank you for making this FLC on behalf of me, and I'm glad to see that this nomination has only made the article even better! Yes, I have not been able to maintain a consistent activity for a while as you can tell. I'm going to move out to a new country for study and there's just so much going on, I couldn't afford time for WP even if I wanted to. I hope it's not a burden for you to handle all the comments here, and I think you deserve as much credit as I do. Thanks once again! GeraldWL 04:30, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• There are 12 properties in the tentative list on both the UNESCO site and the table here, but the text says there are 13 in 2 places.
• "Prior to its leave, Israel": That phrase reads oddly and isn't referenced. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:10, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

  fixed both, thanks! 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 13:47, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Richard Nevell

• As a starting point, the list of current sites, tentative sites, (mostly) criteria, and inscription dates match the most authoritative source on the matter – the UNESCO website.

• The one criteria I've spotted that doesn't match the source is Ancient Jericho. The WP list says it is (i)(ii)(iii)(iv), but the UNESCO website only lists (iii)(iv).

• • Fixed
• The locator map is consistent with other lists of WHS. Others use colour-coding, but that's not necessary here. I have two queries:
• Color coding is used when there are both cultural and natural sites AND/OR, a site with multiple sub-regions.

• Is there a reason Deir al-Balah isn't a link like the other labels?

• • I have changed the labels to be shortened versions of the WHS name like in other maps, I have linked all of them.

• Can the text be made larger? At the moment, the characters are almost the same thickness as the light grey lines to mark internal boundaries on the map, and some of the labels blend in as a result.

• • I agree with this problem, and I have made the text bigger, please tell me if this is sufficient. I was originally going to bold it, but I think that would've been a violation of MOS:BOLD
    • It's not perfect, but it's an improvement and I think making the text any bigger would end up with it bunching. It's probably as much s can be done with the map at that size. Richard Nevell (talk) 19:34, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
• I wonder if it would be worth having a sentence explaining the significance of World Heritage Site status. This could be a useful source.
  • Other World Heritage Sites lists do not do this because it is not as relevant. If someone wants to know the significance of WHS status, then they can click on the main parent page. If someone's using printed wikipedia then they can access that page but I think there is enough context
    • Fair enough. Richard Nevell (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
• The lead gives an appropriate level of detail, comparable to other lists of WHS. The extra political context is appropriate since the issue has significance for UNESCO generally.

• You could say that "Palestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of Southern Jerusalem, Battir" is the largest WHS in Palestine,.

• • Other World Heritage Sites lists do not do this because size doesn't really matter, the age of the first site (how long the country has been actively participating in unesco) and when the newest one was promoted (if it still is participating) and the number matter more. Having too much detail would violate WP:TOOMUCH, WP:SUMMARY STYLE.
    • Sounds sensible to me. Richard Nevell (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
• In 2011, responding to allegations that they were to assign the site to a state: I'm not sure "allegations" is the right word here as it's not disputed that they haven't assigned the site to a state in their list.
  • No, the response was to allegations that they would assign it to a state, like palestine or israel or jordan. This didn't happen though, and UNESCO just said "we won't yet, but we will protect it from degradation and it is palestinian territory
    • Quite right, I misread the sentence. Richard Nevell (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
• Where a site is endangered, there's a brief statement on why except for Jerusalem.
  • will add
• The United States had also withdrew funding, 20% of UNESCO's total, from UNESCO in 2011, under the Obama administration, because American federal law…: that's a little repetitive. How about: The United States had also withdrew its funding of UNESCO in 2011, under the Obama administration, accounting for more than 20% of the agency's budget; this was because American federal law… I suggest adding "more than" since the source cited says "about 22 percent".
  • I will put more than because fdd put that but the "about 22 percent" is about how much biden said he'll fund unesco for, not when obama initially withdrew it
• I am not familiar with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies; what makes them a reliable source of information?
  • It is an American funded advocate organization for Israel. If it is deemed inappropriate then I can remove it and replace it with something else. However, this will result in the loss of the percentage info and while it is a biased source, we aren't putting any bias int he article by using it. idk up to u
• The photo of the Wadi Gaza is of a section in Israel, and not part of the WHS. I'm only aware of two images of the wetlands on Commons, and neither show the area particularly well. This one is the better of the two.
  • Done
• The site descriptions mention when sites were added to the tentative list, but I don't think this is needed as it doesn't tell us why the sites are significant.
  • I think it does, so it can become a world heritage site.
    • I think it's a transient quality and doesn't need to be mentioned as one a site is on the main list when it was nominated is of secondary importance by a significant margin, perhaps not even important at all. Richard Nevell (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
• Established amid the Mamluk Sultanate: maybe Established during the Mamluk Sultanate
  • Done
• Link Mamluk architecture
  • Done
• Battir's valleys and terraces are used for market garden: The grammar doesn't quite work, but either "used for market gardening" or "used as market gardens" would.
• For Battir, I think it would be helpful to give an idea of the age of the landscape that has been designated, as in when were the terraces created.
• named after the namesake saint: This is a bit clunky, and we might as well say "Saint Hilarion".
  • Agree
• The site also includes Herodium, a Roman castle whose fortress was converted into…: While this is in line with what the UNESCO source says, it wasn't a castle in the commonly understood sense (though as a fortified high-status residence its purpose is actually pretty close). For clarity, I suggest The site also includes Herodium, a fortified palace that was adapted into…
  • Done

• Side note: It is very surprising that the article on Herodium doesn't mention the conversion into a monastery.

• Hisham's Palace is referred to as a ski resort. I've not seen that term used in the articles I've read on the palace, and the term UNESCO uses is "winter resort". Maybe instead of A ski resort for the caliph … something like Intended as a winter palace for the caliph…
  • Done
• it was ruined by the 749 Galilee earthquake: This is consistent with the UNESCO source, but implies that the site was abandoned, but there were periods of use into the 13th century (see page 60 of this source).
  • I have changed it to "heavily impacted"
• Instead of [[Qumran Caves|QUMRAN: Caves]] and Monastery of the [[Dead Sea Scrolls]] how about [[Qumran|QUMRAN]]: [[Qumran Caves|Caves]] and Monastery of the [[Dead Sea Scrolls]] Otherwise the list doesn't have a link to the main Qumran page.
  • MOS:SOB warns against this I believe. People can click onto Qumran from the Qumran caves page.
    • In that case the link to Qumran should be preferred as it is the main topic and the caves and monastery are constituent parts of the site. Richard Nevell (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
• I think it would be worth mentioning the year the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered.

That's my first pass. I think some of the descriptions may need a copy edit. The tweaks to prose that I've suggested are not comprehensive. The article has a good structure and sourcing. It could be enhanced by making reference to academic works on relevant sites (eg: the source I suggested on Hisham's Palace) but I'm unsure if that's a pre-requisite for FLs. While UNESCO's description of Hisham's Palace is a bit out of step with some of the research I've seen, the other stuff conforms with my (admittedly limited) knowledge of some of these sites. Richard Nevell (talk) 18:59, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

• • Okay I will begin the copyedit. I believe the descriptions to the sites on the lists are an introduction to the world heritage site, then the reader should click on the link(s) that interest them to learn more. Admittedly, the actual world heritage site articles are not in very good shape, so this is hindered

Image and source review

Easternsahra agreed to a QPQ for List of Singapore LRT stations, so I might as well get it over with. Icepinner 16:14, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Image review

• All images have ALT text
• Map: is it possible to adjust the text for Old Jerusalem City? It's a bit hard to read given the borders

Bit of a pickle here; photographing buildings is allowed under FOP in Palestine, but considering how a template doesn't exist for that on Commons, would it be acceptable for me to pass the image with images having no templates on Palestinian FOP (who would claim copyright for the building considering they're really old buildings, anyways?). Icepinner 16:14, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

• File:Tell es-sultan.jpg — public domain
• File:Bethlehem BW 10.JPG — CC-BY-SA 3.0
• File:16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5686.jpg — GNU 1.2
• File:Beitar-148.jpg – CC BY 4.0
  • Needs a detailed description
• File:GAZA003.jpg – CC BY 4.0
• File:Jerusalem-2013(2)-Temple Mount-Reflection of the Dome of the Rock in Al-Kas fountain.jpg – CC BY 4.0
• File:Kasser Al Yahud 012a.jpg — CC-BY-SA 3.0
• File:IHM דיר אל-קרנטל.jpeg — CC-BY-SA 4.0
  • Needs a detailed description
• File:Jericho Hisham-Palast 2.JPG — CC-BY-SA 4.0
• File:Samaritains garizim 2006.jpg — CC-BY-SA 3.0
• File:Old City (2838428914).jpg — CC BY 2.0
  • This needs a better description
• File:Palestine Qumran BW 6.jpg — Public Domain by copyright holder
• File:Public event in ancient Samaria 11.jpg — CC BY SA 4.0
  • This needs a detailed description

@Easternsahara: I'm going to continue this review tomorrow, given it's quite late in Singapore. I have seen some images that need their description parameter expanded per WP:IUP#RI. Please use this time to do so, along with any other images used here. Icepinner 16:14, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

• I have shortened Old City of Jerusalem to Old Jerusalem, which helps boost its legibility. I have also played around with different sizes and positions for it, and I think it is best read as is.
  • My concern was more with how the "Jerusalem" part was on the border lines, making it difficult to read. If it's really the best position, then I guess we'll go with that. Icepinner 02:55, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Image review (continued)

• File:Umm ar-Rihan.jpg — CC-BY-SA 3.0
• File:قرية راس كركر.jpg — CC–BY–SA 4.0
• File:A Gaza boy drags his belongings in front Gaza's only power plant, bombed by an Israeli tank shell.jpg CC–BY–SA 3.0
  • Is this the best image you can find? I understand images of Palestinian locations are probably hard to come by but is there a better image to illustrate the Wadi Gaza other than a boy dragging his belongings in front of a bombed power plant at that location?
    • No, there was a picture of Wadi Gaza which was better, you could see that if you check it before my edits, but that was in Israel so it was inappropriate for the list.
      • Fair enough then
• File:Shuqba cave 18.jpg – CC0

Some images have their descriptions in Hebrew, German, or Arabic. I have translated each one and will assume in good faith that those translations are accurate.

@Easternsahara: I have finished the image review. Please take a look at it. Now for the source review. Icepinner 02:55, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Source review

Earwig

• Earwig did detect a 95.4% violation with a website. However, that website is a mirror of Wikipedia and shall be ignored here. 35% similarity with a UNESCO webpage, though it's mostly proper nouns and can't be paraphrased. I don't see any further copyvio concerns.

Spot-check

• [3a]: pass
• [7a]: pass, synthed with other sources
• [3b]: pass
• [3c]: pass
• [11a]: pass

More to come, I'm a bit busy at the moment. Icepinner 02:55, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

• [14]: pass
• [18]: pass
• [22]: pass
• [7b] concern: I don't keep up with what's going on in Palestine but the impact of socio-cultural and geo-political transformations wouldn't necessarily imply that the West Bank barrier caused the site to be listed as "endangered", right? Or am I missing out on something here?

• Source 7b explicitly mentions the West Bank barrier (referring to it as a 'separation wall') as one of the factors in the listing: the landscape had become vulnerable under the impact of socio-cultural and geo-political transformations that could bring irreversible damage to its authenticity and integrity, citing the start of construction of a separation wall that may isolate farmers from fields they have cultivated for centuries. Richard Nevell (talk) 16:35, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Ah Icepinner 10:51, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

• [27]: pass
• [31]: pass
• [39] concern: it's estimated to be 60,000 dunam

@Easternsahara: Spot check shows promising results, only 2 concerns. Once all comments have been addressed, I will pass both reviews Icepinner 01:57, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Style comment: I changed the column widths in the tables to the values I am currently using. The images could be full 150px so that they are well aligned, since some are landscape and some portrait. In the tentative list, mostly you have governorate as the location but in some cases you have more specific locations - try to be consistent here. I may check the text at a later point but I see there were already some reviewers. Nice work! --Tone 20:39, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

List of Olympic medalists for the Philippines

Nominator(s): 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because the article is fully sourced and contains everything needed in this list. The lead, although short, describes most of the article. I did all of the things stated in the last archive (as I remember). If the lead is too short, the history section also describes the tables well. In conclusion, it meets the criteria. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• In addition to bolding a name (in "Multi-medalists") you'll also have to use a symbol. * The history section has a MOS:SANDWICH issue.
• You'll need to use the upright param for the images instead of a size (MOS:UPRIGHT).
• The flag in the infobox does not have alt text. (please  mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: Did the column scopes and row scopes for three of the tables. Is it correct? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

  Mostly yes, but with 2 issues:

  • Please make the name as the header cell in every row, instead of the type of medal.
  • The ref column's header also needs a "scope=col". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:14, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: done. Pinging. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 07:57, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

  • Color should not be the only way to distinguish anything (like active competitor). Use a symbol along with the color.
  • Row and column scopes are needed for every table, including in the "Medal tally by sport" and "Medal tally by individual" sections.
  • Some of your tables have row scopes set for every cell in the table. The header cell of a row needs to be on its own line in the wikitext. I've fixed this for one table in the "Youth Summer Olympics". You can follow that for the other tables. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:12, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

    Fixed. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:08, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

    @MPGuy2824: forgot to ping. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:08, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

    • Fixed a few problems that you missed out on.
    • The ref column's header also needs a "scope=col". This isn't yet done. Many of the tables have this issue.
    • I'll support on accessibility in advance, since I trust you'll fix the above problem. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:11, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

      Fixed. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 11:41, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

Do clarify in the first paragraph whether you've completed all the suggestions provided in the previous nomination of this list. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment from Bgsu98

MOS:SANDWICH does not bother me in this particular situation. In fact, it really can't be avoided. The image is vertical and the infobox is vertical, so it is not really a problem. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:43, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "The Philippines made its debut in the Olympics during the 1924 Summer Olympics. The Philippines won its first medal during the 1928 Summer Olympics when Teófilo Yldefonso gained a bronze medal" => "The Philippines made its debut in the Olympics during the 1924 Summer Olympics and won its first medal during the 1928 Summer Olympics when Teófilo Yldefonso gained a bronze medal" (avoids having both of the first two sentences start with "The Philippines")
• "the Philippines gained three medals, the most medals given in a specific competition until 2020" - reword - this makes it sound like it was the most medals won by any nation until 2020
• "The Philippines gained its first gold medal at the 2020 Summer Olympics by Hidilyn Diaz" => "The Philippines gained its first gold medal at the 2020 Summer Olympics when Hidilyn Diaz won [whatever they won]"
• "Moreover, one athlete has gained a medal" => "Additionally, one athlete has gained a medal"
• "the commonwealth won" - this is an Easter egg link as I doubt many people in the rest of the world are aware that it is/was officially the Commonwealth of the Philippines
• "won its first medal when swimmer Teófilo Yldefonso" - link the name
• "the men's 200 metre breaststroke aquatic event" => "the men's 200 metre breaststroke swimming event"
• "After independence from the United States, the country did not win" => "After independence from the United States, the Philippines did not win"
• "the Philippines won another medal at the 2016 Summer Olympics when Hidilyn Diaz" - link Diaz's name
• "finished second at the women's 53 kg weightlifting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil" => "finished second in the women's 53 kg weightlifting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil"
• "won medals, specifically Aira Villegas, with a" - there seems to be a random line break (at least on my screen) after "specifically"
• Some of the rowscopes are missing in the Medal tally by individual and Multiple medalists tables
• That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:21, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

  Fixed everything except the Multiple medalists rowscopes; should I double bold them or not? The "active competitors" thing seems pretty useful. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 07:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

  Ah, I only just noticed the bit below the table. Use a symbol to represent the ones who are active. I am pretty sure we are not meant to use bold to indicate something anyway, as screen readers used by people with vision problems don't read out the "boldness" of the words -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

  Did something using the {{legend}} template; does it seem okay? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:06, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: forgot to ping. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:10, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

  Colour by itself also can't be used to designate something per MOS:ACCESSIBILITY (Color should not be used as the sole visual means of conveying information, or for distinguishing elements such as links, templates, or table rows. Always provide an alternative method—such as an accessible symbol and/or text (for example, ✔ Approved), a colored table with an icon and text (for example, see table on the right), or clearly written footnote labels.). You need to add a symbol as well as/instead of the colour -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Should I use this symbol? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

  Note sure that that is an accessible symbol. I tend to use {{doubledagger}}..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

  Used the symbol. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:33, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:21, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

MrLinkinPark333 (verification check)

I've found a lot of verification issues. As they are a lot, I will sort them.

Prose

• "The Philippines made its Olympic debut during the 1924 Summer Olympics" - fails verification of Citius, Altius, Fortius and GamesBid.
• "the commonwealth won its first medal" - Neither Sports Reference or International Swimming Hall of Fame mention that the Philippines was a commonwealth during 1928.
• "the country was awarded three bronze medals, the most for the Filipinos until the 2020 Summer Olympics." - Fails verification for 2 reasons. BBC Sport does not mention the 1932 Olympic medals for the Philippines. This source also does not have their 2020 medals because it was written before the Olympics started.
• "After independence from the United States, the Philippines did not win another medal until the 1964 Summer Olympics" - citation needed as Olympedia does not mention the Philippines independence nor their medal drought.
• "and his brother Mansueto "Onyok" Velasco - "Philippines at the 1996 Summer Olympics Olympedia source doesn't state that the Velascos are brothers.
• Petecio's Olympedia citation needs to be moved and go after "women's featherweight boxing finals".
• Paalam's Olympedia citation needs to be moved and go after "men's flyweight boxing finals".
• Last part of the History section "Aira Villegas ... semi-finals" needs the extra space removed. Currently, the "In the 2024 Summer Olympics" sentence looks uncited, even though it has a citation.
• "These Olympians are entitled to government incentives under Republic Act 9064 and Republic Act 10699." - citation needed.
• "This excludes the Wushu Tournament Beijing 2008, which was not an official Olympic demonstration sport for the 2008 edition." - citation needed

Tables

• Three tables fail verification of the medallists' home regions. They are Medals gained from the Summer Olympics, Medals gained from the Youth Summer Olympics and Medals gained from Mixed teams.
• There is failed verification from Olympedia in the Medal tally by sport, Medal tally by individual and Multiple medalists tables. This is because Olympedia's IOC sponsorship ended in 2023. Therefore, they don't have any coverage from 2024.
• Panay News does not specify that Tio won the IKA Twin Tip Racing event, as part of the men's kiteboarding.
• Is the years supposed to be the timelines that each athlete competed, or when they won their medals? This is confusing as, for example, Yulo won both of his medals in 2024. In the table, his years are listed as 2020-2024.

Minor issues

• In the prose, I see issues of sources not giving the same exact weight classes and Olympic cities.
• Prose also has issues of sources not specifying that the bronze medal matches for boxing (2020 and 2024) occurred in the semi-finals.
• Tables also have issue of sources not given exact swimming length and boxing weight classes.
• For 2024 boxing in the Medals gained from the Summer Olympics table, IOC does not state classes. They instead use the weights.

Oppose I am very concerned about the uncited and failed verification I found in the prose. I am also concerned about the failed verification of the home regions in the three tables. There are also minor issues, such as weight classes and Olympic cities not being specified in the source. Therefore, I will have to oppose because of the major failed verification issues. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:18, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

List of Billboard Adult Contemporary number ones of 1997

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Here's my 37th nomination in this series. In this particular year, the best-selling British single of all time was released. One of its two sides topped the AC chart in the United States, but interestingly it wasn't the side that generated all those sales. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Bgsu98

I'm genuinely surprised "Candle in the Wind" wasn't the higher-performing of that single. It seemed like it was on the radio all the time.

I have no complaints or suggestions about the prose. It's good, with appropriate wikilinks. After 36 prior FLs in this series, you probably have it down by now. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:10, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• I don't want to be annoying with this, but I think the 1996 chart could be linked.
• You have (pictured in 2009) for the first picture, but not for the rest.
• I also think it would be nice to have consistency for the image captions, so I would go with eleven consecutive weeks, so that it is consistent with spent a total of three weeks.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

@Alavense: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. Nice work. Happy to support. Alavense (talk) 08:00, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Source review

• This is by no means a requirement for a FLC, but it would be helpful to archive online citations to avoid any potential headaches in the future with link rot and death.
• The author for citation 6 ( Artists With No. 1 Albums On The Billboard 200 Who Have Never Cracked The Hot 100) is misspelled. It should be Paul Grein, not Pauk Grein. It is an easy typo to make.
• This is admittedly a minor note, but I would make sure that each of the citation titles are consistently in title case. Citation 10 (Elton John's Candle in the Wind 1997 20 years on - the tribute to Princess Diana that is the UK's biggest selling single of all time) is in sentence case, while the rest of the citations are presented in title case.
• The publication date for citation 13 (60th anniversary of the charts: 30 bestselling singles) should be formatted in the American way, with Month/Day/Year as opposed to Day/Month/Year.
• All of the citations are high-quality and appropriate for a FLC about music. Aside from the minor quibbles that I have discussed above, the citations are well-structured and are consistent.
• I was intrigued by the "specialist bookstores" part discussed in the lead. It is supported in the following citation (Artists With No. 1 Albums On The Billboard 200 Who Have Never Cracked The Hot 100), which further clarifies that this is referencing Christian bookstores. I think that "specialist bookstores" could be read in a few different ways while I believe that Christian bookstore is more specific and more beneficial to reference for readers.
• I have done a spot-check, and everything in the article was supported by the citations.

I hope that this review was helpful. Once my (admittedly quite nitpick-y) comments have been addressed, I will more be more than happy to pass this source review. I hope you are having a wonderful start to your week! Wonderful work as always. Aoba47 (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

@Aoba47: - I have repeatedly tried running the IABot to archive the sources but it just throws errors. I'll look at the other points later today...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:33, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

@Aoba47: - everything else now addressed, I believe, and I will keep trying the IABot..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the response. Archiving is not 100% necessary for a FLC/FL. I just wanted to recommend it for the future. I have not used IABot in a while, so I was unaware that there were any issues with it. Everything looks good to me. This passes my source review. Best of luck with the FLC! Aoba47 (talk) 14:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

List of constituencies of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

I'm back after a few months with the 7th in the Indian constituency series. I've improved the lead and history sections, and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Telangana. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• Source 1 only verifies the 2023 part, not the "3 December" part. Please change it to verify all of this
  • ✓ The specific date wasn't important, so I've left only the year. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
• Infoboxes should ideally be used for things already mentioned in the text, so they usually do not need citations. "First past the post" and "December 2028" are not mentioned in the article, so they need citations. Also, could you add "current legislature" to 16th Rajasthan Assembly as it changes
  • Could you elaborate on the last sentence please? There is no "current_legislature" param in the {{Infobox legislature}} template. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
    • I see, then you can just ignore
  • ✓ I've removed the specific date for the last election and removed the tenative date of the next election since it was speculative (counted as last election +term limit). -MPGuy2824 (talk)
• Source 2 verifies the sentence directly preceding it, and the second instance, but not "the unicameral state legislature" or that the seat is in Jaipur.
  • ✓ Added 2 sources. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
• Source 3 is good, I wonder if you should use Template:Cite map?
  • ✓ -MPGuy2824 (talk)
• Source 4 is good
• Source 5 will not load for me yet, is it dead? but you put "pp. 6, 12." while others u just put a colon and the page number. For sake of consistency, you should stick with either one of these styles
• I will check the other sources later, but 6 has the same concern as 5 with the page numbers
  • ✓ Those sources aren't dead, but probably geo-restricted. I've replaced one of them with a ref that seemed to have been archived before the restriction came into place. I've used the page number next to the citation in all 3 places now. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
• File:Rajasthan Assembly.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:IN-RJ.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Wahlkreise zur Vidhan Sabha von Rajasthan.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• Please change alt texts to the last map (3rd image) to align with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Alternative text for images#Maps and diagrams I think first map is okay but if you want to specify northwest india then its up to you
  • I've added north-west to the first map image. I'm not that good at writing alt-text so this might be a good opportunity to learn for me: I read MOS:ALTMAP, but since the current alt-text for the 2nd map is "Map showing the constituencies of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly", I'm not sure what to do. The best I can come up with is "Rajasthan's ST seats are concentrated in its south and the east, while the SC seats are quite dispersed". Is that good enough? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

  Yes it is good enough 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 12:09, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

  Done. The rest were done before. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• There are large white spaces created on my monitor from the images in both the "Constituencies" and "History" sections, not sure what can be done about this
  • ✓ I have reduced the size of the locator map. Rajasthan is the largest state in India and its location is still visible. Hopefully that fixes/reduces the issue. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
    • pass image review
• The prose itself is quite clear

Thanks, if you ever nominate future lists similar to them, I'll review 'em. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 16:26, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara: I've done a lot of these and have a couple of questions for you (inline). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• Please apply this advice here to the Telangana list as well
• citation nine still has page numbers inside the citation and not next to it.
• sources 12, 13, 15-17, 19-25, 26-28 are georestricted and thus I can not review them. I would assume good faith as this list has not showed errors and the sources themselves verify very minor things
• 11, 14, 18 passes, just verifies existence
• 10 pass both uses
• Please add a source to verify that Jaipur is the capital of the state, it might be a case of WP:SKYBLUE, but I find the refutations to that essay to be convincing.
• Source review pass, support
  • ✓ Fixed both of the latest issues you've pointed out. I'll fix Telangana and the other constituency lists too. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• Why did the number of seats change in 1966? There's no note to explain that.
• District(s) should just be District as no constituency is in more than one district
• That's it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:27, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

  ✓ Fixed both. @ChrisTheDude: thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:44, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

List of municipalities in Málaga

Nominator(s): Alavense (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC) and Mattximus (talk)

Mattximus and I are working on bringing up the lists of municipalities of all Spanish provinces up to the standard seen in other similar featured lists. Our two previous nominations have already garnered some support, so I am nominating another one. This is the 12th nomination in the series and the list has therefore benefited from the improvements suggested by reviewers in the previous eleven. Formatting is also similar to the others. In any case, all comments and suggestions are welcome and will be acted upon in a timely manner. Thanks in advance for all the comments! Alavense (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Image review

Here'll be an image review from me. Arconning (talk) 15:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• File:Malaga in Spain.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Karte Gemeinden und Gerichtsbezirke Provinz Málaga 2022.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Vista de Málaga desde el castillo de Gibralfaro, España, 2023-05-20, DD 113.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Captivating Views of Old Town Marbella.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Mijas 05.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Castillo de Vélez-Málaga.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Fuengirola Puerto 02.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Estepona aerial.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• Alt-text and captions are proper.
  • Can say that image review shall be passed.

Thanks for taking the time to review the list, Arconning. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:39, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support - I got nothing :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:29, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

List of governors of Abia State

Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Abia from when the region was called Eastern then split into East Central and two other states, then East Central was split into Anambra and Imo states, then Abia carved out of Imo. I have made significant improvements on this, and it now meets the criteria for FL. Feedback would be very much appreciated. Thank you already. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comments

• rowscopes for the "primary" column in each row are missing.
• Is it possible to show the bullets in the "Works cited" section? Looks a little odd without them. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 I added 30em to the refbegin enclosure, now the indentation is clear, wdyt? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:52, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

  I just checked a few of the latest FAs in Template:Announcements/New featured content and there seemed to be a mix of how this is done (some had the bullets, while some didn't). I mistakenly assumed that it might have been something that you might have missed. Since you seem to have done it on purpose, I'll leave it up to you if you want to keep the 30em or not. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:17, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

  Oh yes, and also thank you for the heads up for the "!scope=row" for primary. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Reading Beans

I am reviewing this version

Source review

Pass.

• Reliable enough for the information being cited — pass
• Consistent date formatting — pass
• Consistent and proper reference formatting — pass
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable — pass
• Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for — pass

Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:44, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

• Add |first=Chuma |last=Uwechia to Ref13
• Wikilink John Darnton in Ref14.
• Wikilink University of California Press in Ref15.
• Remove the (Nigeria) in Ref20
• Add |first=Emmanuel |last=Oladesu to Ref25
• Add |first=Emmanuel|last=Ugwu to Ref39
• Add |date=5 December 2019 to Ref41
• Add |first=Charles|last=Ajunwa to Ref42
• Add |date=9 June 2024 to Ref43
• Add |date=19 May 2023 to Ref44
• Add |first=Peter|last=Uzoho to Ref69
• Add |date=13 May 2024 to Ref70
• This is optional: Adding Agency Reporter i.e News Agency of Nigeria to the author parameter for Ref72. Generally, I would advise you replace every source with no attributed writer to a source that has a byline. For informations such as the one in Ref71 and Ref72, is easy to get a source with a byline. Let me know what you think.

Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:23, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

@Reading Beans Done, thank you! Channels and Punch reporting an election winner in their capacities as national mediums is reliable enough for me, hence, why I cited them. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:00, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Looks good. Pass. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:46, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

@Reading Beans Thank you so much for taking your time!!! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "After the regional system was dissolved on 27 May 1967 by Yakubu Gowon" - clarify who he was
• "Administrators were usually appointed to rule a state when there is" - tenses of the two verbs are different
• "and got re-elected under " => "and was re-elected under "
• No real need for notes e, f, and g to be in italics -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Right, thank you so much for spotting those, an extra eye is always beneficial. I fixed them. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:14, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:56, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Tyla discography

Nominator(s): dxneo (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

South African singer-songwriter Tyla's discography includes one studio album and two EPs. Her self-titled debut album features the singles "Water" which peaked at number 7 on the US Billboard Hot 100 and won the inaugural Grammy Award for Best African Music Performance, as well as other singles such as "Jump" and "Push 2 Start", among others.

This will mark my fifth nom, I guess. dxneo (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comments

• The "Music videos" table is missing column scopes.
• The same table has MOS:COLHEAD issues.
• The "Peak chart positions" column needs to have scope=colgroup in most of the tables. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:24, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

  Not sure if I understand the last instruction. I tried to cross check with SZA discography, but still. dxneo (talk) 10:03, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

  I've just corrected the issue in the SZA discography list. Please look at that and fix the same problem here too. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:55, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

  Done. Thank you so much. dxneo (talk) 09:49, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Tyla released her debut self-titled studio album on 22 March 2024, which incorporated her digital EP of the same name released on 1 December 2023, it debuted at number 24 on the US Billboard 200 chart" - the second comma should be a semi-colon (or alternatively make that part its own sentence)
• Also does "it debuted" refer to the album or the EP? The wording is ambiguous
• "In 2025, as Tyla prepared for debut mixtape's release" => "In 2025, as Tyla prepared for her debut mixtape's release"
• " She was featured on "When I'm with You by Thai musician" - quote mark at end of song title is missing
• "She remixed WizTheMc's "Show Me Love"" - pretty sure this should be "She sang on a remix of WizTheMc's "Show Me Love"" as I doubt she was the one who did the actual remixing
• "though some noted her Coloured identity might affect her U.S. reception" - I don't think "coloured" needs a capital C mid-sentence

Coloured is a racial group, it should be in uppercase. dxneo (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

• "In July 2025, Tyla announced a mixtape featuring "Bliss" and "Is It" via social media with a pre-save link." - as this mixtape apparently hasn't been released yet, I would be tempted to move this sentence to the end

I wanted to structure it the way it was announced and (will/would be) released. dxneo (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

• In the EPs table you give the title of the more recent one as "WWP" but in other tables you refer to it as "We Wanna Party". Which is its actual title?

My apologies. dxneo (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

• why is the text in the videos tables suddenly smaller? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Fixed. dxneo (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:36, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

76th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 08:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating the 2024 Primetime Creative Arts Emmys for featured list promotion because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how RunningTiger123 formatted the 2007, 2020, 2021, and 2022 ceremonies for this edition. Birdienest81talk 08:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

• Drive-by comments – area awards are not marked and the grammar in the category changes section should be cleaned up. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:51, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

• @RunningTiger123: Done - I marked up the area awards based on this list of winners, and I cleaned up the grammar in the category changes section to past tense. I based the grammar on similar sections in similar FL-quality Creative Arts Emmys lists. Hopefully, these changes satisfy your comments.

--Birdienest81talk 08:17, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support - I got nothing. Outstanding work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:20, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

OlifanofmrTennant

• No ratings data is present

• There is no news source providing information of ratings for the Creative Arts Emmys ceremonies. While a portion of the event is broadcast on FXX, Nielsen doesn't usually report the ratings for this show.

• "[Downtown Los Angeles], [California]" delink California per WP:GEOLINK (same with infobox)

• Done

• Delink "Only Murders in the Building: One Killer Question" and "Shōgun – The Making of Shōgun" as they arent articles and dont have a section on the series pages

• Done

• Ryan Gosling is listed as being nominated for "Host: Ryan Gosling". Peacock lists the episode as "Ryan Gosling: April 13, 2024" as does ScreenRant. IMDb says "Ryan Gosling/Chris Stapleton", as does TV Guide, lot of variety in what its called.

• While those sources have different variations of what that specific episode was titled, for the sake of continuity and since there is no established official title to SNL episode, it is preferred based on previous Primetime Emmy Awards ceremony lists with featured status that the episode title that was submitted for consideration and therefore listed in the official PDF of nominations will be the one used in these type of articles.

• Theres a MOS:DASH violation in Ceremony Information

• I have difficulty locating where the MOS:DASH violation in that section. Is it within the body of the paragraph? Or is it in one of the references.

• Add a Use American english template

• Done

Thats what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 17:49, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

@OlifanofmrTennant: - I have addressed your comments, but there are some points of contention underneath some points.

--Birdienest81talk 23:51, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Support I took care of the dash problem myself Olliefant (she/her) 03:07, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Actually, could an Efn be added to note the other names for the SNL episode? Olliefant (she/her) 13:31, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

List of Master System games

Nominator(s): NaccMan (talk) 11:29, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

This list was initially a complete mess, until I stepped in to fix it all up and now I don't think you can find a better Master System list anywhere. I have been working so hard finding sources and honestly I think this at least deserves some kind of featured status like the other Sega lists. If there is anything that needs improving let me know so this can be a featured list. NaccMan (talk) 11:29, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• Nothing in the lead is sourced
  • So I managed to add some sources, but the second paragraph is all calculated, according to WP:CALC I think it should work. The rest is in progress. NaccMan (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
• "The Master System which was renamed with a redesigned casing from the original Sega Mark III, which had been released in the Japanese market in 1985—is a video game console released by Sega in the North American market in September 1986 to compete with the Nintendo Entertainment System, which had been released in the same market in February 1986 (an earlier test market for NES in New York occurred in October 1985)." - good heavens that sentence is long and hard to follow. I would suggest "The Master System is a video game console released by Sega in the North American market in September 1986 to compete with the Nintendo Entertainment System, which had been released in the same market in February 1986, although an earlier test market for NES in New York had occurred in October 1985. The Master System was renamed and redesigned from the original Sega Mark III, which had been released in the Japanese market in 1985."
• "Originally priced at US$200, North American distribution rights for the console...." - the rights weren't priced at $200 (I assume). I'd suggest separating the price info into a different sentence
  • Deleted the price and distribution rights entirely since its not important. NaccMan (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
• " before Sega re-acquired the rights themselves and released a further streamlined redesign of the console during the launch of the Sega Genesis" - when was that?
  • Added that it was 1990 a year after the Genesis was released. NaccMan (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
• A lot of the release date cells are completely blank. If the date is unknown, I would suggest putting something in to that effect so it doesn't look like you have forgotten to fill in the info
  • This is mainly for Brazilian releases where if a game was unreleased I mark it as unreleased BUT if it was released I put it as blank due to me not finding when it was released. If there is any ideas what to do let me know maybe we could put some sort of symbol or generic footnote for "Date Unknowns", because it wont require a reference since if the info doesnt exist it doesnt exist. NaccMan (talk) 04:32, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
• Linking of publishers/developers is very random. Why is Sega linked in the publisher column on rows 2 and 5 but not row 3? As the table is sortable it should really be linked on every row.
  • Reason why is because if a game is developed by Sega and also the same game happens to be published by Sega we dont have to link it twice. It is to avoid duplicate links in rows I believe. NaccMan (talk) 05:29, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
• Nothing in the second table is sourced apart from one release date
• The notes column of the second table should not be grouped under the release date header
• Also, none of the entries in that column are complete sentences thus they should not have full stops
• Same goes for most of the footnotes
• Most of the footnotes are not sourced
• "Three years later after the initial Brazilian release" => "Three years after the initial Brazilian release". This applied to several other notes as well.
• "Four years later after the initial Brazilian release it was rereleased in Brazil as: Geraldinho." - there is no need for that comma after the word "as". This applies to several other notes as well.
• Quite a bit to fix here, I fear, especially with regard to sourcing...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:53, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• The developers section needs citations.
• As does the publisher section.
• Why is unreleased centred but the dates aren’t.
• Links are inconsistent in the table for example Sega is links most times but not always.
• Some release dates are uncited.
• This is a bit nitpicking but some of the things in the release date section are years and it would be better to rename it or to find out the full info of the dates.
• Why are some parts of the release section just blank, shouldn’t those be marked as unreleased or have a release date.

Ping when done, History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:13, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:22, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

@NaccMan: Do you intend to continue with this nomination? There are unresolved comments from weeks ago now, and this nomination is in danger of being closed for inactivity. --PresN 01:32, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

May I revisit the nomination another time? NaccMan (talk) 02:07, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Yes, absolutely! 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:09, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Candidates of the 2025 Australian federal election

Nominator(s): GraziePrego (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it to be an interesting topic of a recently-concluded and (in my opinion) interesting election. GraziePrego (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

History6042

I will get a review in soon, History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you @MPGuy2824, I believe I have completed those changes. GraziePrego (talk) 10:53, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

  • Bolding of text wouldn't be read by a screen reader. You'll have to mark incumbency (sitting members) and wins with different symbols.
  • rowscopes are needed for the "Summary by party" and "Disendorsements and resignations" tables too.
  • I wasn't a fan of the raw html in the Senate tables, so I tried replacing it in one of the cells with a template. Feel free to revert if you don't like it or it doesn't work for some reason.
  • The tables in the "Senate" section aren't standard tables (e.g. in the ACT subsection there, the first column isn't for "Sustainable Australia" only). I don't know how to overcome this (without changing the table structure), but maybe PresN might have a suggestion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:03, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

    Incumbency and wins are now marked with symbols, will do other changes. GraziePrego (talk) 07:36, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

    Rowscopes done and I'm fine with your template in the Senate tables :) I'll wait a little bit to see if PresN has a suggestion about how to change the Senate tables that have been done in a slightly unusual way :) GraziePrego (talk) 07:45, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

    Rowscopes done You still need to do it for the "Summary by party" table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:13, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

    Done, thank you GraziePrego (talk) 02:07, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

    The problem here is that the information isn't really a table (the columns have nothing to do with every row), you're just sticking boxes next to each other so that it doesn't take up a million rows in one skinny table. There's a way to indicate that it isn't a "data" table but a "presentation" table - (MOS:LTAB). I converted one table as an example. You add role=presentation to the table, drop the caption, change all '!' to '|', and since that killed the styling of the party cells I added in some. Just do the same for the rest of the Senate tables and I think you're good. --PresN 12:41, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

    Done, thank you for showing me that example one :) GraziePrego (talk) 02:22, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

List of governors of Bauchi State

Nominator(s): Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating List of governors of Bauchi State for Featured List status. The article presents a comprehensive chronological record of all military and civilian governors of the state from its creation in 1976 to the present. It is well-structured in a clear tabular format, supported by reliable references, and remains stable without rapid changes or disputes. The list meets the Featured List criteria of being comprehensive, well-written, verifiable, and stable, and I believe it merits recognition as a Featured List. Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Reading Beans

I am reviewing this version

Source review

Passed.

• Reliable enough for the information being cited — pass
• Consistent date formatting — pass
• Consistent and proper reference formatting — pass
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable — pass
• Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for — pass

I’ll get this done before 24-48-hours. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:58, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The Infobox says that the Governor can be addressed as “The Honourable”. I am not really into politics but isn’t this title reserved for members of the legislative body? I would encourage you to cite informations in the Infobox. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:00, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

@Reading Beans Thank you very much for your review. I have fixed it, kindly have a look now.Ibjaja055 (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

There are a lot of unsourced information here and it’s making it hard to review (for me). I advise @Ibjaja055 to go through the article and fix the sourcing issues so that the body supports the lede. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:33, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

@Reading Beans I have fixed the issue with the use of proper in-line citations and I have also either removed or replaced some marginally reliable reliable references. Can you check again? Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

• There’s no page number in Ref2. Also wikilink Cambridge University Press. Also, since it’s a book change the date to |year=2019
• Add |8 June 2023|newspaper=Premium Times to Ref3.
• Change the newspaper parameter on Ref4 to |newspaper=The Guardian
• Wikilink African Economic History in Ref5
• You need to clarify that Ref6 is dissertation (see WP:THESIS). Use {{Cite thesis}}.
• Add |year=2020 to Ref7.
• Change the newspaper parameter in Ref8 to |newspaper=Business Day
• I don’t know the reliability of Neptune Prime. Can you shed some light on it or better still, replace it?
• Wikilink The New York Times in Ref10.
• Wikilink Channels Television in Ref11.
• Wikilink TheCable in Ref12.
• Change the newspaper parameter in |newspaper=Blueprint in Ref13 and Ref14.
• Ref15: the newspaper’s name is in the title. Seperate them and add |newspaper=Daily Trust to the cite template.
• Add a date to Ref16 and change the newspaper parameter to |newspaper=Premium Times
• Wikilink TheCable in Ref17.
• Remove the |location= in Ref18.
• Remove the author parameter in Ref19 and use |website=Ecoi.net in the website parameter.
• Use |newspaper=Vanguard in Ref21&22.
• Change the newspaper parameter to Premium Times in Ref33&34.
• Change the newspaper parameter in Ref35 to ThisDay.

This is all for now before I move to the next. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:52, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

@Reading Beans I have duly effected all the corrections. Thank you for the review. Can you take a look now? Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

I have fixed the remaining issues. I’ll do the spot checks later tonight. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:51, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

@Ibjaja055, I couldn’t do the spotchecks as promised due to real life issues. From my spotchecks, only Ref1 failed verification. It made no mention of the Government House, being the residence of the governor. I believe there are sources out there that can verify this. Another suggestion; the first Northern Region section dived into a lot of federal politics that does not belong to this list. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:20, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

@Reading Beans I have fixed your recommendation and I have also removed the failed source along with the claim. Can you check again now? Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 04:59, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Support on sources. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

List of Great Northern route stations

Nominator(s): JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 23:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

This article is a station list for the corresponding Great Northern route, which I created about a month ago and have been working on since. This is my first FLC so do let me know if I have done / am doing anything wrong. Thanks in advance, JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 23:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Placeholder

• I'll do a full review shortly but one drive-by comment: Italicised lines are those that are not constituent parts of the Great Northern route. is not compliant with accessibility requirements because screen readers used by people with vision issues won't read out that the text is italicised -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:37, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

  Any suggestions as to an alternative? Quite difficult to think of a way of doing it that's accessible but not obtrusive. The article does mention the constituent lines (Cambridge line, East Coast Main Line, Fen line, Hertford Loop line, Northern City line) and if you want I can repeat that before the start of each table as clarification for those unable to know where the italics are. JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 19:06, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

  You can use a symbol instead of/in addition to the italics. See List of municipalities in Jaén which uses a color and a symbol. Make sure to use a legend too when you do this. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

  • Done as a symbol before each line and no more italics.

  I wouldn't say a colour is necessary but a symbol would work -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

More comments

• Link all the stations named in the lead
  • Done
• "Govia Thameslink Railway only share eight stations [...] this will rise to six" - maths doesn't seem to be right here
  • Fixed
• "confirmed to have funded allocated to them" - funding, surely?
  • Fixed
• "Half of the eighteen stations that have been closed did so" => "Half of the eighteen stations that have closed did so" (passive/active verbs don't work as it stands)
  • Fixed
• "London Borough of Enfieldno surface" looks odd and I presume is a typo of some kind
  • Fixed
• Notes d, f, j are not sentences so doesn't need full stops
  • Done
• There are some duplicate notes which can be combined -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Fixed

Hope that's everything. Thanks for the comments and let me know anything else that needs doing. JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 17:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments, JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 17:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Done
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead. Some of your columns have this, but not all.
  • Done
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If

the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.

• • Done
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:27, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Please check I've done it all correctly as I'm inexperienced with tables. Thanks for the comments, JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 17:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

    • Please wikilink the Listing column header.
    • Support on table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:32, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Drive by comments by Mattximus

Surely a featured list on a route should have a map of the route? Is there any metro map style maps available? I feel this is a critical piece for this list to pass. Mattximus (talk) 16:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

The map on Great Northern route is wrong; I will make a new one now. JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 20:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Done. JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 21:12, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Comment

• Please add {{dts}} to the date cells, as sorting seems to be broken (especially in the Former stations table). SounderBruce 23:58, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Done; table sorting is fixed. JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 21:47, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

List of municipalities in Jaén

Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2025 (UTC) and Alavense (talk)

Alavense and I continue to bring up the lists of municipalities of all Spanish provinces up to the standard seen in dozens of other similar featured lists. This is the eleventh nomination and has benefited from all the recommendations from the previous nominations so it should be pretty close to feature list status. All comments and suggestions are welcome, thanks in advance for all the comments! Mattximus (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support - I got nothing -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:38, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Dantheanimator

• Only thing I could think of, for the photo for Andújar, is there maybe a more city-scape/panoramic photo that shows more of the city aside from just one building? I did a brief search in commons and found this photo which feels slightly better, and there's also this photo but maybe there's better photos too. In any case, this is quite minor so support promoting now. Dan the Animator 21:08, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

I changed the image. Thanks for having a look, Dantheanimator. Alavense (talk) 06:39, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• File:Jaen in Spain.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Karte Gemeinden und Gerichtsbezirke Provinz Jaén 2022.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Parador de Jaén 5.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Chimeneas Los Lores y La Tortilla.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Ayuntamiento de Andújar, 2025.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:37132-Ubeda.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• alt text is good, image review pass
• Good sources: 1, 3, 21, 22
• Montizon for 2024 census is listed as 1.595 in source but 1,525 on the table, otherwise source 19 is good

Fixed. Thanks for noticing that, Easternsahara. Alavense (talk) 09:25, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

• For 2011 census Torreperogil is 7.673 in source, it is wrong in article otherwise 20 checks out Source review pass since everything else is standard on other spanish municipality in province articles. good job, but when are we going to get to portugal? jk

Fixed as well, Easternsahara. Thanks again. And maybe one day we'll get to Portugal or another country, but there are still many, many to go in Spain. :) Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

I think Portugal would just be one list, it only has 308 municipalities... Mattximus (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Victorious discography

Nominator(s): Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL criteria. The list has reliable sources and I followed other discographies that are FL. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• The lead seems a little short and I think would definitely benefit from an opening sentence saying "Victorious is an American television show that aired on [whatever channel] from [whenever] until [whenever] and focussed on [whatever]" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

  ChrisTheDude Done. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:31, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• The "Peak chart positions" columns in the tables should have scope=colgroup since they span multiple column headers. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:30, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

  MPGuy2824: How do I put it on there? Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:31, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Victorious is an American television show [...] It focused" - both verbs should be in the present tense
• Notes a, b and c are not full sentences so they don't need full stops
• That's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

ChrisTheDude Fixed. I appreciate the comments. Let me know if anything else needs to be fixed. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:52, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

List of Dad's Army radio episodes

Nominator(s): Mr Sitcom (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I have recently improved this list substantially (if I do say so myself), adding various citations and expanding the lead to reflect all aspects of the list. This list has recently been peer reviewed, with a few comments being raised and improved upon. Mr Sitcom (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Dad's Army is a British television sitcom" => "Dad's Army is a British television sitcom broadcast between [whenever] and [whenever]" would give extra context
• "From 1974 to 1976, a radio series was broadcast on BBC Radio 4" - maybe "a radio version"......?
• "It was written by Harold Snoad and Michael Knowles, based on the scripts of the television episodes written by Jimmy Perry and David Croft. It was produced by John Dyas" => "It was written by Harold Snoad and Michael Knowles, based on the scripts of the television episodes written by Jimmy Perry and David Croft, and was produced by John Dyas" (avoids a very short sentence)
• "The first series consisted of twenty-one episodes, including a Christmas special, which aired in 1974" => "The first series consisted of twenty-one episodes, including a Christmas special, and aired in 1974" (current wording makes it sound like only the Christmas special aired in 1974)
• "The series starred...." - might be worth making it clear that these actors also played the same roles on TV
• Same with James Beck a bit later
• "Although most of the television episodes were adapted to radio, the following were not" - might be worth noting how many episodes of the TV version there were, as at this point we don't know if 13 "unadapted" episodes was a large proportion or only a tiny fraction
• "Only one Christmas Night with the Stars sketch" => "Only one of the Dad's Army sketches broadcast as part of the BBC's Christmas Night with the Stars programme"
• "as the radio series ended before the ninth series had aired in 1977" => "as the radio series ended before the ninth television series had aired in 1977"
• Don't think you need to mention that Dyas was the producer twice in the lead
• "Although James Beck recorded this episode before his death, he does not appear in this episode" - at first glance this doesn't seem to make sense. Did he record a part which was edited out?
• THat's all I got. Great work! I can remember watching Dad's Army (as repeats - I'm not that old!) but never knew about the radio version so this was an interesting read -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your feedback! I'm glad I have educated someone about this little-known spinoff to Dad's Army! The comments have now been addressed. Mr Sitcom (talk) 07:58, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @ChrisTheDude: I have since added an additional citation and additional information about casting. I thought I would let you know in case anymore changes need to be made as a result of this. Mr Sitcom (talk) 10:38, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

All good :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:18, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:13, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• However, only Lowe, Le Mesurier and Dunn appeared in every episode, as having each member of the cast in every episode was deemed unnecessary by the BBC radio department. However, all members of the main cast appeared from the second series onwards - Two consecutive howevers there.
• A technical team composed of Eric Young, John Whitehall, and Ian Richardson - A serial comma is used there, but there are other instances in the list where it is not used. I think the easiest solution is to get rid of this one.
• This was the final episode to feature Private Walker as portrayed by James Beck, who died soon after recording the episode - Maybe This was the final episode to feature Private Walker as portrayed by James Beck, who died soon after recording it, to avoid the iteration.
• Although this episode was recorded before James Beck's death, his character does not appear in this episode - Same issue. Maybe Although it was recorded before James Beck's death, his character does not appear in this episode?
• This episode features the first appearance of Larry Martyn as Private Walker. This episode was recorded at the end of the recording block for the second series; the earliest episodes of that series do not feature Walker - I suggest something along the lines of This episode, which features the first appearance of Larry Martyn as Private Walker, was recorded at the end of the recording block for the second series; the earliest episodes of that series do not feature Walker
• Keep Young and Beautiful needs dab, as it points to an article about a song.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 07:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback! These comments have now been addressed. Mr Sitcom (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Happy to support. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:40, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

List of presidents of Dartmouth College

Nominator(s): ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:53, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

My first non sports FLC, so hopefully this goes well! Dartmouth College is the ninth oldest college in the United States and a member of the Ivy League, this article lists all of their presidents since it's founding. Thanks in advance to anyone who leaves their feedback :) ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:53, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

The note "Joined College: 2023." seems unnecessary in the notes field for the current president since the year her tenure started is identified in the preceding cell. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:08, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Ah yes, this was a remnant from when I was converting the tables. Fixed ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:28, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Also, I don't know how pretentious this might be, but if the current president is a woman, wouldn't it be "alumna"? Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:57, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Apparently yes.  Done ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:17, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• Is there an appropriate link for "recusals"? I don't think this is a commonly-known word
• Fragments like "Dartmouth alumnus (1771)." don't need full stops
• That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done all ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:47, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:20, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• The no image images are not needed, please remove them in favor of nothing.
• Please have more specific alt texts.
• Please archived the sources that aren't.
• Could a Template:Infobox official post be added?
• In paragraph two the whole paragraph can be sourced to an inline citation of source four, instead of multiple of the same one repeated.
• "Not a Dartmouth alumnus", does not need a period as it is not a full sentence.
• Could information on terms, term limits, and how often elections are held be added?
• Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:02, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

@History6042:  Done all except the last. There isn't a set term or limit, it's just whenever the previous president resigns or dies. ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:28, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Alright, support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:39, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Swedish Figure Skating Championships

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:54, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

The results of this competition are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, and the sources are properly formatted. This particular list is structurally very similar to Ukrainian Figure Skating Championships and Estonian Figure Skating Championships, both of which have also been promoted to FL. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments, and I look forward to any constructive input.

Note: I have received special permission for this third FLC nomination here due to the time sensitive nature. Most of the sources require a subscription, and while I did purchase a month's access in order to complete this article, I would really like to not renew it for another month. It is also not possible to archive the Svenska Dagbladet articles. I can send via e-mail screenshots of any articles that another editor would like to examine as part of the source review. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:54, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• On my laptop screen there's a huge whitespace under the lead - does that need to be there?
• That's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

  User:ChrisTheDude: As far as I can tell, that photo gallery – plus the tables that follow – are too wide to fit into the space to the left of the infobox but under the lead. If you have a possible solution, please share. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:03, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

  • Maybe it's a screen size thing, but I removed the {{clear}} template and the gallery was still well below the infobox...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:05, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

    I shrunk the image in the infobox, which shrunk the overall size of the infobox and therefore should have shrunk the whitespace some. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:08, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

    User:ChrisTheDude: All removing the {{clear}} template does is move the Senior medalists header up, but the photo gallery remains below, so the whitespace is just shifted down. I think it's just unavoidable. Once Sweden announces the date and location of their 2026 competition, I can add it as a follow-up which will fill in some of the space, but they haven't announced that yet. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:12, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

    I removed the Previous and Next fields from the infobox, which shortens the height of the infobox. Having fields that say 2025 and 2026 doesn't really add anything, since the infobox says Annual, and the dates aren't linked to individual pages. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:22, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

    All removing the {{clear}} template does is move the Senior medalists header up, but the photo gallery remains below, so the whitespace is just shifted down. - none of that happens on my screen if I remove the template but maybe it's due to my screen size. Anyway, I don't think there's technically any rules prohibiting whitespace (even if it looks odd to me) so I will support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

    User:ChrisTheDude: Does the whitespace at least look smaller since I shrunk the size of the infobox? Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:30, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

    Yes -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:48, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

    Okay, I'm glad to hear it at least helped some. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:13, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

• (Copied from this talk-page with new date) For references to swedish newspapers and books there are open sources online at Kungliga biblioteket / National Library of Sweden, but currently I don't know about stable URLs at the website. Best regards Migrant (talk – contribs) 00:10, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Additional note from nominator: I am hoping to avoid having to purchase another month's subscription to the Svenska Dagbladet or having to save screenshots of 70+ articles, so if anyone is willing to do the source review for this FLC by September 4, that would be super appreciated. I can e-mail you screenshots of whichever articles you would like to examine. Warning: they are in Swedish. Please let me know if you're able to help, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:16, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Is this page useful https://allskaters.info/swedish-championships/ ? Best regards Migrant (talk – contribs) 16:31, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Those results are incomplete; some only identify the gold medalists. The results I have are complete with the newspaper archives to support each entry. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:37, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Figureskatingfan

• Sources: I'm going to AGF that the Swedish references are used correctly, since the nominator is a trusted and experienced editor for figure skating articles and figure skating competition articles, and because I don't speak Swedish myself. I say that so that you don't spend any more on subscriptions. I'm also sure that the English sources are all good, especially the SkatingScores refs, which are commonly used to document scores and standings. I have comments about two refs, though; see below.
  • Ref90, "Communication No. 1119", does the ISU have other communications that list national champions? If so, maybe you can replace the Swedish subscriptions ones. If not, please disregard the request.

• Those communications are actually my least preferred sources and I only use them when I can't find literally anything else..

• Hmm, that's interesting. I like to use the ISU Communications for the figure skating articles I work on, which tend to be about elements and the sport's rules. I try and keep up to date with them, so that I can include the most recent changes, which occur often in the sport. I'd think another good source for your purposes is the ISU's media guide, which has medalists lists and the medal tables for all ISU competitions. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:35, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

• • Ref1: Your claim that Ulrich Salchow invented the Salchow jump is easily supported in many other sources. For example, which I got from the Salchow jump article: Hines, James R. (2011). Historical Dictionary of Figure Skating, p. 193; and "ISU Figure Skating Media Guide 2023/24, p. 16. If you used those sources, you wouldn't have to depend upon a subscription source.

• I swapped in a different source.

• I like the images used, and thanks for following the Figure Skating project's guideline about archiving all sources. I don't mind the extra white space discussed above.

Since my comments are easily addressed, I enthusiastically SUPPORT this list for promotion for FLC. Good work, as always. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

• User:Figureskatingfan: I had already made screenshots of all of the Swedish sources before the renewal date, including the ones used at Nordic Figure Skating Championships, so they are still available to anyone interested. I don't speak Swedish either, but I was able to figure out enough to navigate the articles. Thank you for your support! Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:48, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

• I'm a Norwegian native (born-and-bred) and speak Norwegian and understand Swedish (been there and my mother had a penfriend which we visited and they visited our family during summer-vacations, but it was several years ago, and i am still watching some swedish TV-channels). Although I'm more into speed skating. So if there are any screenshots you are uncertain of I can always have a look. Best regards Migrant (talk – contribs) 21:32, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

• User:Migrant: The Swedish article is all set. If you have any feedback that would help promote this to Featured List, I would love to hear it. 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:03, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

• I think there are room for another blue-linked biography for a 2-times winner in ice dance for the years 1984 and 1985 no:Christer Tornell another sources for the same guy https://sceneweb.no/en/artist/861/Christer_Tornell, https://hotelcaesar.fandom.com/wiki/Christer_Tornell, https://www.seher.no/kjendis/fikk-beskjed-om-at-han-kunne-ha-kreft-og-hiv/64175179 og https://www.odeung.no/no/hjem. Best regards Migrant (talk – contribs) 16:32, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

List of caviids

Nominator(s): PresN 02:26, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Hey everyone, mammal list #60 in our perpetual series and rodent list #5: Caviidae. This is the first in a series of seven lists covering the Caviomorpha parvorder, aka "things shaped kinda like guinea pigs" (though it also includes porcupines, so it's not a great name). So we start out with the family that includes the guinea pig, 18 other species that look like feral guinea pigs, and 2 species of capybara, which has gotten recent internet fame for being very large and chill-looking. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 02:26, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

• Support - nothing to pick up -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:07, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

History6042

I'll do an image review here: History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:30, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

• File:Wildmeerschweinchen-06.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0 de
• File:Cavia aperea distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Cavia magna (Wroclaw zoo).JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Cavia magna map.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:George the amazing guinea pig.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Cavia tschudii 31084241.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Cavia tschudii distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Cavia patzelti distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Cavia intermedia f825.JPG - Public Domain
• File:Cavia intermedia distribution.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Cavia fulgida distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Galea flavidens distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Galea musteloides1.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Galea musteloides distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Galea leucoblephara 33484925.jpg - CC0
• File:Galea leucoblephara distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Galea comes 453524410.jpg - CC0
• File:Galea comes distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Preá-do-nordeste (galea spixii).JPG - CC BY 3.0
• File:Galea spixii distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Microcavia niata distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Microcavia shiptoni distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Microcavia Australis.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Microcavia australis distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Чакоанская, или чакская, или малая мара (Dolichotis salinicola), Chacoan mara, Kleiner Mara, Tierpark Berlin Friedrichsfelde, 10.2012.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Dolichotis salinicola distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Dolichotis patagonum 99386074.jpg - CC0
• File:Patagonian Mara Dolichotis patagonum distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris in Brazil in Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 09.jpg - CC0
• File:Capybara range.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Hydrochoerus isthmius 19742666 (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Lesser Capybara range.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Kerodon-acrobata-asportella.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Kerodon acrobata distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Kerodon rupestris.jpg - CC BY 2.5
• File:Kerodon rupestris distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• All images have alt text.
• Image review pass, and I support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:40, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks to History6042 for doing the image review but I would like to note that File:Philander frenatus distribution.svg and File:Cavia magna map.svg have dead links for what they're based on (or atleast they wouldn't open for me)

  also File:Lesser Capybara range.png is based on a map which is based on a map, and so forth untill we get to File:Capybara-range.png which itself does not cite any sources. I checked most of the maps except the ones that NordNordWest made, which i checked about half of and then just assumed good faith cuz the guys got a good track record. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 23:52, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

  Fixed the links (the IUCN changed its link format several years back) and replaced the Lesser Capybara map image with another one that directly cited the IUCN. --PresN 01:17, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

• The lead is good.
• Recommend wikilinking melons and squashes
• That's it. I'm happy to support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:25, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

  Done. --PresN 14:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

List of protected areas of Peru

Nominator(s): JustEMV (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi everyone! I was inspired by the recent WHS featured lists. For my first FLC nomination, I have chosen Peru, one of the most biodiverse countries in the world. I apologize if I have overlooked anything. Any review or feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you all in advance! JustEMV (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• Please change the map's alt text per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Alternative text for images#Maps and diagrams.
• Please archive all online sources.
• Can you add conversions to the hectares.
• Regions should only be linked once.
• .00 is unnecessary in the measurements, please remove them.
• "Mount Huascarán, Peru’s highest peak, located within Huascarán National Park" needs a citation for the highest peak part, and that the mountain is in the park.
• Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:32, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you really much @History6042! I’ve addressed all the issues. Regarding the region links, from what I understand, MOS:REPEATLINK allows repeated links in tables or lists when they help with navigation, as seen in some featured lists. That said, I’m happy to remove them if there’s a preference for trimming down. JustEMV (talk) 23:57, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

  No, that seems fine, support and good luck with your first FLC. :) History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

  Appreciate it! JustEMV (talk) 00:02, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• ill do a review soon

  Thank you Easternsahara! Looking forward to your review. :) JustEMV^🦙 (talk) 01:12, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

• Please add an engvar template to deter article deterioration
• File:Mapa de Áreas Naturales Protegidas de Administración Nacional a setiembre de 2024 (cropped).jpg - CC BY 4.0 thank you very much for this
• File:Peru, mount Huascaran.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Manu National Park-71.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Cordillera Azul National Park - ZooKeys-277-069-g005.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Paracas National Reserve. Ica, Peru.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:P1030590 Pérou, Reserva Nacional Salinas y Aguada Blanca, premières vigognes à l'état sauvage (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Pacaya Samiria Marañon River (66217327).jpeg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Bosque de Piedras (Huayllay). 3.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Puya raimondii en la Reserva Nacional de Calipuy (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Machu Picchu, Peru.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Aves en Pantanos.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Panorama Cotahuasi.jpg - PD
• File:Panoramic view of the Reserva Comunal El Sira.jpg - CC0
• File:Atalaya to Pantiacolla Lodge (23821713805).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Alto Mayo 598-602mod.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Cordillera huayhuash at sunny day.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Lago Menor o Huiñamarca Perú Bolivia Satelital map 68.85829W 16.png - PD
• File:Imponente Volcán Yucamani.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Choquequirao - 5621104428.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:View of Huacachina.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Panguana-Lupuna-2008-2.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Área de conservación privada Abra Málaga Thastayoc-Royal Cinclodes 0-21.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Fotografía sobre el Área de Conservación Privada Campo Verde en Ucayali 05.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Flag of Peru (state).svg - PD
• I think that the first image, the map, could use more descriptive text. As the policy which History5042 cited says "With maps, diagrams and charts, the colour, position, and size of elements are not important. Instead, concentrate on the information being presented". Right now, you just have "Map of Peru showing the distribution of national protected areas by category:" which does not describe the information being presented. Instead just put the general location of everything, like "national parks are mostly found in the east and north of peru (just an example idk if its right)" Specify the general trend and indicate if there are outliers. This will be tedious but it is necessary
• otherwise the alt text looks quite good and detailed, does not just repreat the caption.
• the sronly text looks good but I don't know if it is necessary to specify "of Peru" on a page entirely and only about peru?
• future source and prose review perhaps coming, i will pass image review once my concerns are addressed. I would like to thank you for countering systemic bias by contributing to this page.
• Also I don't see the point of adding abbreviations to the legend for each of the tables, and I'll be removing some of the elements from the legend of those tables which don't use it.

  Thanks again. I’ll do the rest this weekend; in the meantime, I’ve added the engvar template and removed “of Peru” from the sronly text. JustEMV^🦙 (talk) 12:49, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

  Done. Please let me know if the alt caption looks good now or if it still needs any refinement. JustEMV^🦙 (talk) 02:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

More comments

• Should "National System of State‑Protected Natural Areas" be redlinked? I searched for it on spanish wikipedia, but couldn't find anything.
• Should "Protected Natural Areas Day" be redlinked?
• "The National System of State-Protected Natural Areas is the network of nationally administered protected areas managed by the National Service of Natural Protected Areas under the Ministry of the Environment. " → "The National System of State-Protected Natural Areas (is the only network of nationally administered protected areas, managed by the National Service of Natural Protected Areas which is under the Ministry of the Environment."
• "Its objective" Are you talking about the objective of the Ministry of the Environment, the National System of State-Protected Natural Areas, or the National Service of Natural Protected Areas? Please phrase it in a clearer way
• I think everything else is fine but what does the em dash in the column represent? Does it mean that the value is unknown or that it is zero? At first I thought the latter but then saw 0 being used in one of the tables so could you include this in the legend for the tables that use them.

  Done Easternsahara, thank you for the suggestions. I did not add redlinks for National System of State-Protected Natural Areas or Protected Natural Areas Day, as I don’t think they are notable enough for standalone articles per WP:REDLINK. I also replaced the em dashes in the visitor numbers column with “Unknown” (the source is given in the column head), following the approach used in this recent FL. JustEMV^🦙 (talk) 03:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, it looks good. I will pass image review and endorse the promotion of the list 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 13:05, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you JustEMV^🦙 (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Reywas92

• Can you add descriptions to at least the national parks and ideally some of the other categories? They don't have to be more than a sentence or two each, but the list seems uninformative compared to other FLs like List of national parks of Canada, List of national forests of the United States, and others at Wikipedia:Featured lists#Nature reserves and conservation areas.
• "Peru comprises 256 protected natural areas" –> "Peru has..." The country comprises a lot more than the protected areas
• "managed nationally by SINANPE" It seems that SERNANP manages the SINANPE, as the SINANPE is just the set of places that doesn't do management
• "Areas which" -> "Areas, which"
• Remove "View of" in image caption since all photos are implied to be views
• The key for purple in the National Reserve section says "park"
• The visitation statistic for Machu Picchu seems very wrong.
• None of the private conservation areas have wikilinks, but there should be at least one in the table since Panguana is linked in an image caption. Same for regional conservation areas – even if there's not an article for Huacachina Lagoon Regional Conservation Area, a link to Huacachina would be appropriate. Please check if any others should be linked somewhere.

Reywas92^Talk 01:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @Reywas92, I’ve already implemented most of the suggestions. Regarding the Machu Picchu statistic, I included the one from SERNANP, which I believe doesn’t count citadel visitors (over 1.5 million), as those are managed by the Ministry of Culture. I’ve added an explanatory footnote to clarify that. Let me know if it should be handled differently. JustEMV^🦙 (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

List of heteromyids

Nominator(s): PresN 02:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hey everyone, mammal list #59 in our perpetual series and rodent list #4: Heteromyidae. Cousins to our last list, the gophers, here we have the kangaroo rats (and pocket mice). They're 63 tiny little guys with long tails and big back feet, hanging out all over the Americas. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 02:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

• I would wikilink succulent plants (first cited with Gaumer's spiny pocket mouse unless I missed it earlier).

User:PresN: That's it. Like the others I've reviewed for you, it's excellent. I'll go ahead and support right now since I only have the one suggestion and it's not a deal-breaker. I'll come back and do the source review another day. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:15, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Already linked 2 mice higher up (though there was a typo). Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 14:22, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

• Support - I got nothing -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:57, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Image Review

History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:16, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

• File:Kangaroo-rat.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Agile Kangaroo Rat imported from iNaturalist photo 191451232 on 9 January 2023.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Dipodomys spectabilis spectabilis 416332.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Dipodomys-microps.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Dipodomys-deserti.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Dulzura Kangaroo Rat imported from iNaturalist photo 42392732 on 13 April 2024.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Dipodomys nitratoides.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Dipodomys ingens.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Padre Island kangaroo rat.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Heermannskangaroorat.png - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Merriam's Kangaroo Rat.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0

More coming soon. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:22, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

• File:Dipodomys venustus santiluciae - Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History - DSC06626.JPG - CC0
• File:Dipodomys nelsoni by Renee Regan.jpg - CC0
• File:Ord's kangaroo rat.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Dipodomys ordii map.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Dipodomys ornatus.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Dipodomys ornatus distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 2.5
• File:Panamint kangaroo rat.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Dipodomys phillipsii perotensis 4697586.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Dipodomys gravipes 64346443 (cropped).jpg - CC0
• File:Stephens' kangaroo rat.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Kangaroo mouse.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Heteromys desmarestianus 2080141.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Gaumer's Spiny Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 182456081 on 17 April 2022.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Heteromys irroratus texensis.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Heteromys irroratus distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Heteromys nelsoni imported from iNaturalist photo 65355542 on 20 June 2020.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Heteromys pictus 2016299.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Heteromys pictus distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Heteromys adspersus distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Heteromys salvini.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Heteromys salvini distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Mus anomalus Thompson 1815.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Chaetodipus baileyi.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Chaetodipus californicus.jpg - CC BY 4.0 - The animal is barely visible in the hand
• File:Cerralvo Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 187890059 on 13 April 2024.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Chaetodipus eremicus 380821.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Dalquest's Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 190966917 on 12 April 2024.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Desert pocket mouse.jpg - Public Domain

Rest to come soon. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

• File:Chaetodipus hispidus2.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Little Desert Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 187495659 on 18 April 2022.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Chaetodipus formosus imported from iNaturalist photo 10634696 on 13 June 2019.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Narrow-skulled Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 155559381 on 12 April 2024.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Chaetodipus nelsoni imported from iNaturalist photo 27682025 on 13 June 2019.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Chaetodipus intermedius intermedius 351159.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Chaetodipus fallax.jpg - CC0
• File:Sinaloan Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 194828634 on 13 April 2024.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Spiny Pocket Mouse.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Perognathus parvus.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Perognathus parvus map.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Perognathus longimembris-Little Pocket Mouse.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Perognathus merriami.png - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Olive-backed pocket mouse.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Perognathus fasciatus map.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Apache pocket mouse (Perognathus flavescens apache) crop.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Perognathus inornatus.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Perognathus flavus.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Perognathus flavus distribution.png - CC BY-SA 3.0

Image review pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:52, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Source review from LEvalyn

• No red flags in the reference list, all sources look reliable and appropriate. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• Earwig is pristine. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• For the spot check, I looked at cites 6 (a, l, and m), 7, 12, 14, 16, 35, 43, and 64 as numbered in this diff. They all verified without copyvio. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• There's a fair bit of material without inline cites, but I'm assuming this is a standard practice of some kind...? Specifically, I notice a lack of footnotes in "Conventions", "Classification", and the table's "Scientific name and subspecies" and "Range" columns. I think the "Conventions" section is actually explaining the sourcing for those two table columns, but I'm not entirely sure why Hafner et al. isn't cited for the other parts of "Classification". I know you're a master at these articles so I basically just want some confirmation that nothing was accidentally left out here! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• That's my only "concern" so once you give me the thumbs-up I'll be happy to pass the source review. It looks great! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

  @LEvalyn: Yes, "Conventions" is describing the sourcing for those two columns (name/range are from the IUCN cite in each row), while "Classification" is just restating the table in words. Hafner et al. is just for the structure of the cladogram, which isn't inherent from the tables and needs a dedicated cite- it's not as obvious since there's 1 or 2 genera per subfamily in this list, but for bigger families the tables are just alphabetical while the cladogram can get fairly complicated. All of this has been standard practice for the last ~60 lists. --PresN 14:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

  Gotcha, thanks for spelling it out to me! I figured it was probably something like that, but wanted to make sure I understood it. In that case the sourcing looks great and I am happy to pass the source review. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 17:21, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

List of works by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Nominator(s): Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL criteria. I have worked extensively on this list. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Reading Beans

I am reviewing this version

Source review

Passed.

• Reliable enough for the information being cited — pass
• Consistent date formatting — pass
• Consistent and proper reference formatting — pass
• Appropriate wikilinks where applicable — pass
• Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for — pass

SafariScribe, does Ref 13 cover the informations for every information from where it’s located to the very bottom? Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:38, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Support on sources. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 04:59, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

LEvalyn

• I think this needs more context: analysing her father's stories including the ones about Biafra -- who is her father and what is Biafra? A wikilink would probably suffice for the first, but a small gloss would be helpful for the latter. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• Should the prose introduction also include a sentence on each of her later two novels? ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• I made a few small prose edits directly, which I think will be uncontroversial, though of course as always you should feel free to change for discuss any which you don't consider to be improvements. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• I think the heading hierarchy could be more useful. (It feels like a waste for there to be only one top-level heading which is just "everything".) What do you think about removing "Literature" entirely and making all others top-level headers? Or, they could be grouped into a few broad categories, eg, books; short fiction; short non-fiction (with the more specific second-level headers within those categories). ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• Several of the headings need to be changed to sentence case. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• The Best Short Stories 2021: The O. Henry Prize Winners should be identified as an anthology, not a short story, if she edited the collection as a whole. (If she published a short story inside of it, we should name the specific short story and put it with the other individual stories.) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• The inline external links in "Lectures and speeches" should be converted to footnotes. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• That's what caught my eye, looking this over primarily interested in the prose. What a thorough list -- great to see! Please ping me when you've had a chance to respond to my comments. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

  @LEvalyn, I have fixed the article. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:43, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize

Nominator(s): Dan the Animator 05:32, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Started working on this about a few months ago and I think it's about as ready for the FL process as it can be. This is my first award list FL nom so excited to see how it turns out and hoping to eventually use this as a general model/template for the other Ukrainian award list-type articles. Many thanks in advance to everyone for the comments and feedback! :) Dan the Animator 05:32, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

This was originally a drive-by comment. More thorough comments will appear below this brief earlier discussion. Is there a reason all of 2010 is italicized? Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:16, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: The footnote on 2010 and the lead explains into more detail but for 2010, the three laureates listed were selected to win the prize but the president never signed the decree needed to make that award official & to give the rewards. That said, would it help if something else was added? The Ukrainian Wikipage formats 2010 the same as 2013/2018 (i.e. with just a short paragraph explaining that year's situation) but I feel like that formatting is inaccurate since 2010 did have laureates in a way. Dan the Animator 06:29, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: I added into the lead a brief explanation so it now reads "were selected by the award committee for 2010's prize (shown in the table in italics)" though let me know if additional changes/additions would make it more clear. Also can make it bolded too for greater contrast though I think the italics stand out enough as is. What do you think? Also thanks for being the first nom commenter :) Dan the Animator 22:45, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Infobox

• Lest I bring the wrath of the Capitalization Police© into this discussion, there appear to be some capitalization irregularities in the infobox. I would have State prize as that does not appear to be a proper noun, and then I would capitalize the first word of each item (ie. Oustanding contributions, A diploma).

• Done fixed State prize, Outstanding, and changed the rewards field to begin with Diploma. Speaking of capitalization, should the article be moved to "Oleksandr Dovzhenko State prize"? Official legislation refers to it as a State prize and it would make the article more consistent though I'm not sure if there's any standards for award article titles. Let me know what you think. Also I wouldn't worry too much about the Capitalization Police©, I think my recent edits should take care of any of their concerns ;)

• I'm not sure a special notice of posthumous awards is necessary in the infobox, since they will no doubt be noted in the table below. I assume the 3 posthumous awards are included in the 37 total?

• Yup, the 37 includes the posthumous laureates. I added it in since the award infobox does have the field for it and it is a useful stat though I can take it out if it's too confusing. The lead and table both mention/note the posthumous laureates.

Lead

• Considering today's climate, I would probably not refer to anyone as "Soviet Ukrainian". I would just stick with "Ukrainian".

• Dovzhenko primarily self-identified as and is generally considered by sources as a Soviet citizen. That said, he was also born in Soviet Ukraine to a family with Ukrainian heritage and is strongly associated with Ukraine, especially in the context of this award. Thus, the most accurate/straightforward description of his identity is Soviet Ukrainian and the link to Soviet Ukraine also clarifies this too.

• I would recommend a proper lead (brief description of the award, brief explanation of the process, and total number awarded), and then a separate section afterward where you can go into more detail. You have several lengthy footnotes that, quite honestly, would work better as actual text.

• I would think the lead as-is is proper. It already has all the components you mentioned: a brief description of the award (paragraphs 1/2), brief explanation of the process (paragraphs 1/2), and total number awarded (paragraph 3) and doesn't include any excess information (all the lengthy details are placed in the footnotes which I think works well here since the majority of the info in the footnotes isn't necessary for a general understanding of the award). This is also supposed to be a list after all and I tried to model it on the other current award FLs (particularly the Arthur C. Clarke Award) and I think the current organization of important/general info in the lead and extra/detailed info in the efns works well.

• "for 2010's prize" – Consider rephrasing this as "for the prize in 2010".

• Done

• "For Huba, he was later awarded as the sole laureate for 2014..." This fragment sounds awkward. "Awarded" needs a direct object; maybe a different verb like "recognized" or "honored" would work better?

• I reworded it to For Huba, he was later officially given the award as the sole laureate for 2014 in recognition of his overall career and contributions to Ukrainian cinema. Let me know if it's better now.

• "No individual has yet officially received the prize more than once although Huba remains the sole person to have won the competition (i.e. be selected by the award committee) twice: in 2014 and in 2010's unawarded prize." This is contradictory, although I get what you're trying to say. I would simply ended the sentence at "once", and then start another sentence to explain the technicality behind the unawarded title.

• I thought it would be good to keep these two in the same sentence to emphasize the distinction between winning the prize and being awarded the prize. The statement "No individual has yet officially received the prize more than once" isn't correct without the caveat put in by the second part because, depending on how that statement is read, technically Huba did actually receive the prize twice. For 2010, he just didn't get the diploma/medal/cash rewards and, based on a literal/strict reading of the prize's rules, the prize was not given because of the unsigned presidential decree (although as some of the other footnotes imply, the award often historically hasn't been kept to all of its rules, mostly with deadlines and such). This caveat is reflected in the official source cited (Ref #6 from the Dovzhenko Film Center) which describes the 2010 award as actually having been "awarded" (quote: In addition, in 2010, the film crew of "The Declaration" was awarded the Dovzhenko State Prize, but the ruthless role of Soviet functionaries was skillfully intercepted by officials of the new era: for unknown reasons, the order was not signed at the "highest level."). Personally, I think if the sentence is fully understandable, that might be the most important thing because explaining this sort of technicality without the excess detail that's left for the footnote is difficult.

Table

• I would capitalize the first word in each cell (ie. Actor, Director, etc.).

• The capitalization, spelling, order, etc. is all taken verbatim from the official presidential decrees cited (this is also explained in footnote m). I think for accuracy, given the Profession/Honorifics column isn't necessarily supposed to represent the laureates' Profession/Honorifics but just what the presidential decree says, keeping it source accurate would be ideal.

• Maybe remove the "for his/their..." Just start with "Outstanding contribution to... blah, blah, blah.

• Again, per above, everything was copied verbatim from the presidential decrees. For source accuracy, this should be kept as-is. Also worth mentioning other award FLs also have their rationale column entries starting with a dizzying number of "for"s (one example)

• For years where there are multiple recipients, how did you determine what order to list them? Barring any explanation, I would list them alphabetically, since they're all (presumably) equal.

• Unless there's a mistake somewhere, they should all be listed in the same order as they are in their cited presidential decrees.

• 2010 table formatting

• Although all the above about capitalization, the "for", and ordering are based on the presidential decrees, for 2010, because there is no presidential decree, it's done mostly for consistency with the others (i.e., capitalization matching all the other years, the "for" wording keeping it consistent with the other year rationales, and the ordering based on the other group years (1998, 1999, 2004, etc.) where the director is always listed first, then the cinematographer, and then the composer

• Movie titles should be italicized and without quotation marks.

• Fixed everywhere in the article except the table. Because 2010 is distinguished with italics, I thought italicizing the movie titles would make it somewhat confusing. There is also the issue of whether the Declaration of Love movie title should/shouldn't be italicized since the whole text as-is for 2010 is already italicized. What do you think? I could use bolding instead of italics to distinguish 2010 but I feel like that would make it stand out way too much compared to the rest of the table. There's also the option of color but again it would stand out too much and color is generally less preferable for creating distinctions in tables. Also, as mentioned in the much earlier conversation/replies, the Ukrainian Wikipage formats 2010 similar to the unawarded years and my intention with the italics was to make it so 2010 does stand out a little but not too much since a lot of the sources do ultimately treat the 2010 laureates as laureates

• If the whole text is italicized, then underline the movie title in that instance. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:30, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Bgsu98: Done, I added in the underlining and italicized the rest of the movie/book titles Dan the Animator 21:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

• Having the 2010 data italicized is fine. You can merge those reference cells since they all show the same reference (currently no. 6).

• I think having individual reference cells for each row just looks nicer (the alternative creates excess whitespace that can't be removed) and it doesn't hurt to repeat the refs for each row imo

• This is an entirely personal preference, but I would shade in the 2013 & 2018 long cells with a slightly different shade to make it stand out. Personally, I use color no. e5e4e2.

• Done perfect suggestion, thanks Bgsu98! :) Went with the light gray default color which felt a bit better for this list

• I would do the same for 2020 and 2023 with some text like "No prize awarded". You don't have to provide an explanation since a) this was already mentioned in the text above, and b) you don't an explanation to give.

• Done

Footnotes

• Like I said, those footnotes are ginormous, and really should be incorporated into the article proper.

• I don't think it makes sense to have that sort of detail as prose imo and the footnotes help for convenient placement

I always appreciate seeing Ukrainian interests promoted on Wikipedia, so this is a great article, but the structure needs some work. Please let me know if you have any questions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:06, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @Bgsu98:! :) Finished replying to everything I think and let me know if the replies make sense and if there's anything else I can do. Dan the Animator 05:47, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: it's been a minute and I think I addressed everything above so let me know your thoughts. Hope all's well and thanks for the review :) Dan the Animator 23:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Dantheanimator: You have some dates formatted D/M and some M/D. You need to pick one (probably D/M), and make sure they're all consistent. Additionally, the notation about the dagger icon, which you have embedded in a footnote, needs to be placed above the table per MOS:LEGEND. The table also needs a caption. Those are all edits that need to be done. I still strongly believe that rowspanning the references makes sense, especially considering the column immediately before it – the Rationales – are already rowspanned. I also believe the text in the Profession and Rational column should be in sentence-case (meaning the first word should be capitalized). Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98:

• Done I think I fixed all the date formatting so they are all DMY (personally, the dates read very strangely the way they are now so if someone else could verify that they're still grammatical that'd be great). Also let me know if I accidentally missed any
• For the legend, could you give an example FL with the formatting you had in mind? All of the FLs with legends that I've found include it for cases where color is also used together with the symbol and I can't find the legend template that seems best suited for this case Any format is fine, as long as it appears before the table.
• Should already be done I think?? The table includes caption="Tabulated list of recipients of the Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize" but I'm not sure if this is a sufficient alternative to the code in the table markup page you linked (in my past successful FLNs, I never had an issue with using this caption markup so hopefully it should be alright as-is) I checked and the caption is set for screen-reader, so it's all good.
• Done After second thought and testing it out, I added in the rowspanning for the Refs column where applicable. Thanks for suggesting it again Bgsu98! :)
• For the reasons given earlier above and considering other current FLs have it the same, I still don't think that making the two columns in sentence case is necessary

Also, I wanted to bring this question from above up again but do you think the article title should stay as-is or be changed to "Oleksandr Dovzhenko State prize"? The Ukrainian language name has 'state' uppercased and 'prize' lowercased ("Державна премія") but in English, at least in the U.S. in my experience, it's common to treat official award names as proper nouns. What do think? That's up to you; I would probably keep it all capitalized.

And sorry about the delay... got caught up with other things for a bit

Dan the Animator 02:35, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

User:Dantheanimator: Once you get the legend in place, I can sign off on this. Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: done, added in all the relevant markup and templates. Let me know what you think and many thanks for the suggestion :) Dan the Animator 01:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• File:Ukraine award Dovzhenko.JPG - Public Domain; Image review pass
• You seem to be using American english, add the use american english template

• Done

• also add use dmy dates template

• Done

• The award was established by presidential decree on 10 September 1994 by Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Dovzhenko's birth" → "The award was established by presidential decree on 10 September, 1994. Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma did so to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Dovzhenko's birth" making it into two sentences will vary the prose, make it shorter and easier to understand.

• I think the sentence as currently written isn't particularly long and is straightforward imo. Also don't think it makes sentence to put "10 September 1994" and "100th anniversary of Dovzhenko's birth" in separate sentences since the latter directly refers to the former

• Sure but then can you make it "The award was established by Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma's presidential decree on 10 September 1994 by" I thought it was kind of confusing.

• I just took out the presidential decree part since it's not too important for the sentence and is already technically implied as-is. Take a look now and let me know what you think....it definitely reads a bit better :)

• "Committee for the Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize of Ukraine" should this be linked, if there is so much coverage for this prize, then there should be for individual committees, yes?

• There is an article about the Committee on the Ukrainian Wikipedia but I couldn't find enough coverage/sources to support having a separate article here. I could make a redirect to this page if it helps though. What do you think?

• You could make the redirect, that is fine.

• Made the redirect. Also should apologize but I think I mixed up this prize with another since I couldn't find the committee wikipage for this award. Sorry for the mistake with that and thanks for commenting on it

• "Award decisions are made by the Committee for the Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize of Ukraine—a group of eleven leading figures in the country's cinema[d] appointed by either the government of Ukraine or the Committee's chair on a voluntary basis to review prize submissions and identify the best works of Ukrainian cinema" → "Award decisions are made by the Committee for the Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize of Ukraine: a group of eleven leading figures in the country's cinema[d] appointed by either the government of Ukraine or the committee's chair. Serving voluntarily, their purpose is to review prize submissions in order to identify the best works of Ukrainian cinema."

• Great suggestion! :) I split the sentences though used somewhat different wording. Take a look and let me know your thoughts

• "The Committee's final selection is then sent to the Ukrainian president, who officially grants the award by September 10[f] through a presidential decree and designates the cash amount for that year's award.[" → "The Committee's final selection is then sent to the Ukrainian president, who, through a presidential decree, officially grants the award by September 10[f] and designates the cash amount for that year's award." I think it is more organized and prose is more varied this way

• I did some general rewording in that and the other preceding sentences so hoping it's better now. Let me know what you think of it

• "The same individual is eligible to receive the prize more than once, provided that at least five years have passed since the first award and that they have made new outstanding achievements in cinematography since then." → "An individual who was previously awarded the prize can receive it again, provided that at least five years have passed since the previous award and that they have made new outstanding achievements in cinematography since then." The same individual is unclear

• The award rules technically allow anyone to receive the prize an indefinite number of times so I wanted to emphasize that the same one person could win the prize many times. I think the phrasing "An individual who was previously awarded the prize can receive it again," implies more that an individual can receive it twice and doesn't emphasize the lack of a limit. What do you think? If it helps, I could reword it as "The same person".

• Yes, you are right. Instead you can put "An individual who was previously awarded the prize can receive it again, multiple times," Here you are emphasizing the multiple times but not making the individual part any more unclear.

• Going through this and different options I got from ChatGPT, I think this sounds the best: "Individuals may receive the prize more than once, provided that at least five years have passed since their last award and that they have made new outstanding achievements in cinematography since then." Also made a few minor edits in the other sentences. What do you think?

• "to the award's committee" → "to the award committee" I have seen award committee used before, but never award's committee.

• Done switched out all instances of it

• "when the committee notifies the president of the chosen winner" was the system to choose president of a group explained previously? I might have missed it but it seems worth explaining.

• president refers to the President of Ukraine, who is the one who officiates the award through a presidential decree as explained in the lead's first paragraph. I thought of restating that sentence from the first paragraph here but I thought it would be too redundant. What do you think?

• Oh okay, yes I agree it would be too redundant. However, I was confused because it says "president of the chosen winner", so I thought that the group of winners elected their own president. I see the original meaning, to clarify can you put Ukrainian president or national president. Otherwise you can also distance the "president" from the "chosen winner". Example: "the president is then notified by the committee of the winner" but then it sounds like the winner has their own committee. Maybe you can add a comma?

• After going through this and some ChatGPT rewordings, I went with this: "when the president receives the committee’s selection", which I think also ties in well since the part of the sentence just before it kind of defines selection with "selecting the final awardee(s)". What do you think? I definitely think this is an improvement from before to say the least

• Love to see expansion of coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia, please ping me for further clarification or when the issues are resolved.

• @Easternsahara: I think I applied or addressed all the suggestions above but let me know if there's anything else I can do and many thanks for the review :) Dan the Animator 03:43, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara: sorry for the second ping but I addressed all the follow-up replies and everything. The lead's gotten much better so many thanks for all the great suggestions! :) Let me know if it's better now and if there's anything else I can do or if you're ready to support. Dan the Animator 04:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for the last response but yes, I support Easternsahara (talk) 23:39, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! :) Dan the Animator 23:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Comments from simongraham

This looks a very compelling nomination. I will add some comments shortly. simongraham (talk) 03:52, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

@Simongraham it's been some time since your earlier message. No rush but maybe update your comment if you're no longer planning on leaving suggestions. Thanks! Dan the Animator 21:58, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

• The lead section provides an excellent overview of the prize, its history, and its importance in Ukrainian cinema. The use of English and Ukrainian sources is excellent as it provides a level of depth for the prize. The context is there, but the article could benefit from some further expansion to make it clearer why this prize is significant on a national and cultural level.

• Thank you! :) For further expansion, what did you have in mind? Any specific questions/ideas? The lead already states that "[a]s a state award, the prize is the highest national recognition for cinema in Ukraine" but I sense your comment is about something more?

• I suggest areas may include the significance of cinema in Ukraine, how Ukrainian cinema is seen globally, the coverage of the award in international media, whether the recipients go on to other awards, whether any of these have changed over time, and whether the fall of the Soviet Union or other geopolitical events have affected it. Much of this is likely to be in more general literature like Beumers's Directory of World Cinema[1] or Rollberg's Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Cinema[2]. I also note that there are prizes called the Dovzhenko Award [3] and the Dovzhenko Gold Medal [4] listed in some of the literature attached to some of the same people. Are they the same as this award?

• I can add a little bit contextualizing the award amongst other current Ukrainian film awards (e.g. the Shevchenko prize) and maybe other European/other film awards. Regarding Ukrainian cinema significance/perception, I'm leaning against as this strays away from the topic of this article—which should be about the Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize—and goes into what should be the scope of the article Cinema of Ukraine. Coverage of award in international media—from my past searches, there isn't much of anything in English. Also, important remembering this award has only existed since 1994 so it hasn't had that much of a history and the USSR's dissolution in 1991 predates the award. Will work on this more though. About the two similar-named prizes, the sources have viewing restrictions so I can't tell. Judging from the names though, I would guess that they are all one of the same (the Dovzhenko Award sounds like the shortform name and Dovzhenko Gold Medal is probably referring to the gold medal laureates receive and maybe is also a synecdoche for the award). @Simongraham If you have access to the quotes/parts of those two sources, could you copy the relevant excerpts and message them to me on my talkpage so I can look them over?

• Although I prefer a physical book, I believe these are on Archive. The links above should direct to the relevant pages. Your point on history is well made.

• Indeed and apologies regarding my earlier dismissiveness! After accessing and reading through the book pages you linked, and locating some further sourcing regarding, there is indeed a separate, completely unrelated award called the Oleksandr Dovzhenko Gold Medal dating from 1972. I also will have to continue searching since so far sources have been limited to passing mentions and it's still unclear if it a separate award or an alternative name for the Gold Medal but the Dovzhenko Award also seems to be a distinct prize. I added in the references, citations, and materials I've collected so far, about these two alternative prizes as well as comparing/describing the modern Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize in relation to other cinema prizes/its international perception/etc., into the article commented out and will continue the process in my future work with the list.

• Aware of the need for the article to be comprehensive, consider further explanation of how the prize compares to other national awards in Ukraine or the broader post-Soviet space. How does it compare? How is it unique?

• Is/will be addressed above

• Consider expanding why Oleksandr Dovzhenko was chosen to be honored and the importance of his centenary.

• I would think the sentence "It is named after acclaimed Soviet Ukrainian film director and screenwriter Oleksandr Dovzhenko, who was among the world's top filmmakers and a major figure of the Soviet film industry." would be self-explanatory enough for why Dovzhenko was chosen though I could reword/add in more if it helps. The award was established together with various other establishments/events marking his centenary in a presidential decree that explained the reason simply as celebrating "the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the birth of the outstanding figure of Ukrainian culture Oleksandr Dovzhenko". Centenaries are generally one of the anniversaries that garner greater celebrations (i.e. 10th, 50th, 100th, etc. anniversaries are typically the main ones) and Dovzhenko was chosen simply because he is an "acclaimed...Ukrainian film director and screenwriter...who was among the world's top filmmakers and a major figure [in cinema overall]".

• I understand, but feel that the sentence could be expanded to explain why he was chosen to be honored. Although the circumstances of the foundation are different, compare the detail provided in the History section in the Featured List on the Copley Medal with this article. There is an extensive the literature on Dovzhenko and his works [5] that may be able to provide background information.

• Thanks for the Copley Medal link! Regarding the Copley Medal's history section, I think it reaffirms the current approach. In that whole section, only one sentence is actually about Sir Godfrey Copley. The rest narrates the evolution of the prize's guarantors and recipients, and prizegiving regulations, which is already covered in the same level of detail on this article (there are already detailed footnotes about the Dovzhenko prize committee evolution/composition, certain notable recipient cases, and changes in the prize amount/currency). To further clarify, why was Dovzhenko chosen to be honored? Was it because then-President Kuchma had seen and enjoyed his movies and wanted to honor him? Or because someone recommended honoring Dovzhenko? Or maybe a combination of these things? I will try to do some more searching but chances are there is no recorded reason for Kuchma's decision to honor Dovzhenko with an award and film center beyond the fact that Dovzhenko is generally considered amongst film critics, historians, academics, public citizens overall as one of the best filmmakers of his time globally and of all time in Ukraine. There is nothing really else behind this as far as I know but I'll definitely see what I can do and feel free to let me know if you find any sources offering any more information regarding the rationale background behind naming the award after Dovzhenko.

• Unfortunately not. Maybe there is something in the Ukrainian literature?

• I might add a bit more information, probably in the context of sources that are added for describing the award's perception in international media, but I strongly think the current detail should be good enough for meeting WP:FLCR

• Is there any detail on the selection process that can be added?

• It depends, what details were you thinking? Are there any questions regarding this that the article leaves unanswered/ambiguous? The footnotes cover a lot of selection process specifics though there are additional details I left out that I could add in if they are beneficial

• The footnotes are extremely valuable and well-researched. I feel much of their content could be integrated with the text as it is not "too detailed or awkward to be in the body of the article" (as per MOS:NOTES). In addition, if there is anything that compares the process to other similar schemes, I feel that would be advantageous to readers in helping contextualise the award.

• Thank you! :) I will consider it but for the time being, assuming there isn't too much additional content to be added and given the careful planning/organization that went into balancing the content successfully into footnotes and prose, I will leave it as-is. About "compar[ing] the process to other similar schemes", what did you have in mind? Is this referring to the idea of comparing it to similar types of awards (national/presidential-given awards)?

• It is. It feels to me that this is one of a number of awards that rose out of a more general post-Soviet movement to promote cultural identity in the new nations.

• Great point! I think I'll probably do the research and content generation work for this together with the other things at a later time given this isn't essential for passing the FLCR

• Recommend using more secondary sources where possible as per WP:SECONDARY.

• Great point! Added in some supplementary secondary sources some time ago into the lead but I anticipate some more will be added with the resolving of some of your other suggestions

• Consider including any controversies if attested in reputable media.

• The main controversy, regarding 2010, is already covered, though there are some "controversies" regarding some individuals not being selected or some individuals being selected, or about where the prize is given and who is giving it, amongst other similar things, but I would think these aren't particularly notable for Wikipedia? Also, how would I approach covering something as undefined/quasi/semi-sensationalist as these less controversies?

• Suggest moving the content from footnote j to the main text and expanding it to a sourced discussion on the gaps in the award provision.

• The lead already does touch on footnote j's content though I don't think merging the content in would be ideal. Earlier on, I put substantial effort into finding sources but for some reason, there are no online sources that explain the gaps in the award's provision (the closest I was able to find was a brief mention in a news article about the 2021 prize that simply says "As you know, last year [2020] the Dovzhenko Prize was not awarded, and in 2019 its laureate was film director Serhiy Loznytsia for creating the film "Donbas"."). I would think this is acceptable since this seems like a case of WP:OBV. Thus, given the lack of sources/explanation, I think the current format works best.

• That is really interesting. I suggest it may be worth look at the articles in the Soviet literature like Sputnik [6] to see if there is anything. Incidentally, while I appreciate you point about it touching pn the content, I feel much of the detail in the footnote is relevant to the main body and is not "too detailed or awkward to be in the body of the article".

• This award was established after the Soviet Union's dissolution so I'm not sure how any Soviet literature would help explain gaps in the award (which to be clear are all well after 1991)

• That is a fair point. See my comment above. I understand your frustration with the limitations of online information, but also the challenge with offline data and the FA nomination process.

• Indeed though in truth it usually is an enlightening experience finding new ways to find information and also being part of my motivation for editing

• Recommend adding images of the recipients that have been most covered in the literature.

• I think this would open the possibility of contentions and the article appears/formats well already without images so if it is alright, I would prefer not to add any additional images from what is already there.

• Fair enough. It would be interesting to know if there is a similar debate in WP:YEARS.

• Unrelated to this nomination but I have seen some debates with images at WP:YEARS, mostly regarding the panorama photo and, before the change in format, deciding which people to give images for in the births/deaths sections (can't find the link but I think it was a few year articles in the 1990s or 2000s).

• While the Rationale column does give some detail on the recipients, consider providing more detail on the more notable winners in the main text.

• Good point though which ones would you characterize as notable and why?

• Meeting WP:CREATIVE would be a minimum, but, given the context, I feel it would be appropriate to focus on anyone that has actively influenced or promoted the award as well as if they have broader international notability.

• Re "WP:CREATIVE would be a minimum": this would apply to nearly all of the laureates, save maybe three or four (so at least 30+ individuals). About "actively influenced or promoted the award", the footnote d already somewhat covers this by listing which laureates also served on the prize committee. Mentioning if they have international notability is an interesting idea and would be a nice addition to the award rationale but for source accuracy (i.e. keeping it word-for-word with the awarding decrees), I would strongly prefer to keep it as-is.

@Dantheanimator: I realise that this is not the most active page on wikipedia but hope my comments are useful. This is a very interesting article and I look forward to seeing how you progress it. simongraham (talk) 11:34, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @Simongraham for the especially comprehensive review and your comments are truly useful and appreciated! :) I apologize I haven't been able to reply sooner, these past few weeks were amongst the busiest for me, but I believe I'll have enough time in the coming week or two or three to get this closer to a great, successful completion. Let me know your thoughts/follow-ups on my new replies (I believe I replied to everything above) and also excited to see how this progresses. Best, Dan the Animator 06:02, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

@Dantheanimator: Thank you for your time responding. Those are all reasonable comments. Although I feel there is space for more context while remaining WP:ROC, I understand your concerns. simongraham (talk) 22:08, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Many thanks @Simongraham for the very helpful replies and guidance! I mentioned already a bit above but it seems, after doing further digging, that there is a fair amount of work that I'll be doing regarding a number of the points you brought up. I already started collecting the necessary sourcing and getting a better sense of some of the unknowns like the two other Dovzhenko awards dating from Soviet times, but this will be a lengthy process that I'll be doing over a long time, outside the process of this FL nomination. And, that said, I think considering the Wikipedia:Featured list criteria is a lot less stringent than the FA criteria, and given the remaining main points are not essential imo for this list's quality, it would be best to promote as-is.

Also because this nomination is the oldest now in queue and being some months old it will likely be closed in very short order, I would say the best approach is to leave the remaining, complex researching and tertiary content additions for post-promotion where there won't be any time constraints, as opposed to adding in the content now where it would be a bit rushed. Let me know your thoughts and thank you again for the detailed suggestions and insights and for really elevating this article and topic area! Best, Dan the Animator 13:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

@Dantheanimator: Thank you for your work on this article so far and your considered responses to my comments. I think your view sounds reasonable and am happy to support this nomination on that basis. simongraham (talk) 04:10, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Nominations for removal

How I Met Your Mother season 1

Notified: Haha169, WikiProject Television

Continuing with TV season nominations (see the recent FLRC log), this article is being nominated for FLRC as the consensus has shifted to promoting these lists through GAN/FAC. This nomination is not intended to discuss the article's quality – it's actually in reasonably good shape, and I could see it passing GAN fairly easily. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Delist. Season articles are not lists. If they appear as a list, that is only because they lack much of the content needed. As can be seen by this article, it's clearly more than a list. Gonnym (talk) 07:44, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

• Delist, per project consensus. Alavense (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives season 1

Due to the consensus against "Episodes in a season" being a list or being nominated for featured list status, I am nominating this for deletion. The article itself seems to be in good shape, but that is irrelevant and thus I have not checked it for comprehensiveness. I decided to nominate this to speed up the process of delisting all the 'season' lists, thanks. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 00:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

• Delist per project consensus, but I agree that the page seems to be in good shape and could probably do well at GAN as-is. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:38, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
• Delist, per project consensus. Alavense (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

List of winners of the Chicago Marathon

Notified: TonyTheTiger, MrLinkinPark333, KyuuA4, WikiProject Athletics, WikiProject Chicago, WikiProject Running, WikiProject Illinois

I am nominating this for featured list removal because the lead and summary table are not up to date, not all information in the tables is sourced, the manual of style for tables and images is not followed, and the images could be improved. In October 2023, I had first mentioned these issues on the talk page. In January 2024, I had also added clean-up templates on the list itself. Some information has been updated since, but many of the issues with this list still remain, here per section:

Lead

• Winner counts don't match Country summary table
• Image doesn't have an alt text (MOS:ACCIM)
• The photo of Khalid Khannouchi was taken during another marathon (New York City)

History

• The section heading seems unnecessary, could be merged with the lead

Winners

• Not all table rows have source references
• Images don't have alt texts (MOS:ACCIM)
• Table doesn't have a caption (MOS:DTAB)
• Table doesn't have row headers
• Only photos of male competitors, none of female or wheelchair competitors
• The photos are not in chronological order like the table they accompany
• The photo of Robert Kipkoech Cheruiyot was taken during another marathon (Boston)
• The photo of Felix Limo was taken during another marathon (London)
• The image caption for the photo Robert Kipkoech Cheruiyot doesn't match the description on Wikimedia Commons

Wheelchair division

• Not all table rows have source references
• The table doesn't have a legend for the green color
• The table uses only color as marker (MOS:COLOR)
• Table doesn't have a caption (MOS:DTAB)
• Table doesn't have row headers

Country summary

• Count doesn't match Winners and Wheelchair division tables
• Table doesn't have a caption (MOS:DTAB)
• Table doesn't have row headers

– Editør (talk) 22:12, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

• A lot of this formatting could be pretty easy to fix. I've already taken care of the row headers, and I can work on a lot of the other issues. For sourcing, the current ref. 17 could be used for a lot of the winners (there are probably other sources compiling winners out there that are more up-to-date). Regarding images taken during other marathons... photos from Chicago would be preferred, but I think it's fine to use pictures from other races for particularly relevant individuals without pics in Chicago (in the same way that, say, we might include pictures of Academy Awards winners from other events). RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:04, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

  You've made a good start with the headers.

  That reference number 17 is a primary source. It is my understanding that secondary sources are preferred for a featured list and for this particular marathon I expect that those are available.

  After a quick look at commons:Category:Chicago Marathon, I don't think photos from other marathons are needed, but if they are used, this should ideally become clear from the caption. – Editør (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

  Fixed the counts in the wheelchair and total columns. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

  When counting the 1995 men's wheelchair winners each as 0.5, I think the number of United States men's wheelchair wins is 23 not 25. When counting them as 1 each, it would still only be 24. And I don't understand the ordering of the Country summary table, none of the columns seems ordered on loading the page. – Editør (talk) 21:22, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

  Changed 25 to 24. I don't know if it should be halves or not for 95. Might be easier to sort by total winners. If there's a tie, then the countries could be ABC order. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:35, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

  As an example: in the article 2024 European Athletics Championships, the Medal table ranks by number of medals, there two winners would be 2, but the Placing table ranks by number of points, there two winners would be 1. I think the Country summary should follow whichever is closer in purpose for this list.

  The running and wheelchair races seem so different that ranking the wins for both of them in one table seems slightly odd to me. However, this list is about both, so there is something to say for having one summary table and not two. Either choice seems fine to me when there's solid reasoning behind it. Does it make sense that Switzerland ranks third overall when they have zero wins in the running race but eleven in the wheelchair race?

  The different categories have different winner totals, so maybe each column should also have a cell with the total at the bottom (probably in a row fixed at the bottom). These different totals may also influence the choice for having a combined table for running and wheelchair or not. – Editør (talk) 07:51, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

  I think the countries should be rearranged by total wins after all 4 events. The first 5 countries in the table are out of order. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:09, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

  Total wins is only the first column to order the list by. When multiple countries have the same total, they should probably be sorted by alphabet, which means the countries with one winner are also out of order. – Editør (talk) 08:17, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

  And I think the Country summary table headers should be consistent with the rest of the article, so all Male/Female or all Men's/Women's. –Editør (talk) 21:26, 16 August 2025 (UTC)